336. Validation of a methodology for SPECT/CT absolute quantification. (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 336. Validation of a methodology for SPECT/CT absolute quantification. (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- 336. Validation of a methodology for SPECT/CT absolute quantification
- Authors:
- Ferrando, O.
Chimenz, A.
Ciarmiello, A.
Foppiano, F. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To evaluate the activity quantification performance of our SPECT/CT scanner (SYMBIA T2 – SIEMENS) and to verify a methodology for absolute activity quantification. Methods: Quantitative SPECT/CT studies can be performed using the methodology proposed by Zeintl et al.[1] . The instrumentation consists of an uniform cylindrical phantom (5680 mL) and an IEC NEMA torso-phantom with hot sphere inserts. 99m Tc was used to prepare the radioactive solutions. Different sphere-to-background ratio (RSB ) were used (61:1, 44:1, 33:1, 10:1). Images were reconstructed using the proprietary OSEM 3D algorithm with resolution recovery (FLASH 3D, Siemens Healthcare), CT-based attenuation correction and energy window-based scatter correction. A system calibration factor (S) relating the count rate ( cps ) and the activity ( mCi ) contained in a tridimensional volume was determined together with the activity recovery coefficients. The phantom results were extended to 99mTc-MAA patient acquisitions for activity quantification in liver lesions. Lesions contouring was performed using the Volumetric Analysis Software (Siemens Healthcare). Results: A calibration factor of 17190 cps/mCi was obtained for 99m Tc. Recovery coefficients (Fig. 1) vary from 90% (for volumes ⩾25 mL) to 20% (for volumes up to 0.5 mL). For 128 updates and no post-smoothing filtering we obtain the maximum activity recovery (about 90%) for a volume ⩾25 mL. Hot sphere contrast and activity quantificationAbstract : Purpose: To evaluate the activity quantification performance of our SPECT/CT scanner (SYMBIA T2 – SIEMENS) and to verify a methodology for absolute activity quantification. Methods: Quantitative SPECT/CT studies can be performed using the methodology proposed by Zeintl et al.[1] . The instrumentation consists of an uniform cylindrical phantom (5680 mL) and an IEC NEMA torso-phantom with hot sphere inserts. 99m Tc was used to prepare the radioactive solutions. Different sphere-to-background ratio (RSB ) were used (61:1, 44:1, 33:1, 10:1). Images were reconstructed using the proprietary OSEM 3D algorithm with resolution recovery (FLASH 3D, Siemens Healthcare), CT-based attenuation correction and energy window-based scatter correction. A system calibration factor (S) relating the count rate ( cps ) and the activity ( mCi ) contained in a tridimensional volume was determined together with the activity recovery coefficients. The phantom results were extended to 99mTc-MAA patient acquisitions for activity quantification in liver lesions. Lesions contouring was performed using the Volumetric Analysis Software (Siemens Healthcare). Results: A calibration factor of 17190 cps/mCi was obtained for 99m Tc. Recovery coefficients (Fig. 1) vary from 90% (for volumes ⩾25 mL) to 20% (for volumes up to 0.5 mL). For 128 updates and no post-smoothing filtering we obtain the maximum activity recovery (about 90%) for a volume ⩾25 mL. Hot sphere contrast and activity quantification improve with higher updates while the sphere to background ratio and the background variability increase. A balance between activity recovery and background variability is obtained with 8 iterations, 8subset and no filtering. Applying the phantom results to 7 MAA-99mTc acquisitions, activity accumulated in liver lesions can be determined with an accuracy ⩽10% (Table 1). Conclusions: With the proposed methodology spect activity quantification can be reached with an accuracy ⩽10% for 99m Tc acquisitions. In the future the method will be tested also with other isotopes used in the clinical practice. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physica medica. Volume 56(2018)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Physica medica
- Issue:
- Volume 56(2018)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0056-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 265
- Page End:
- 266
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques
Physique -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.physicamedica.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.345 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-1797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6475.070000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9461.xml