Neuroplastic changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients from neuromechanical decoupling. (7th November 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: An, Yong Woo; DiTrani Lobacz, Andrea; Lehmann, Tim; Baumeister, Jochen; Rose, William C.; Higginson, Jill S.; Rosen, Jeffrey; Swanik, Charles Buz
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. Volume 29:Number 2(2019)
• Page Start: 251
• Page End: 258
• Publication Date: 2018-11-07
• Subjects: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -- electroencephalography -- functional joint instability -- joint laxity -- neuroplasticity -- somatosensory cortex; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1111/sms.13322
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-7188

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify how the brain simultaneously perceives proprioceptive input during joint loading in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) patients, when compared to healthy controls. Seventeen ACLR patients (ACLR) and seventeen controls (CONT) were tested for the somatosensory cortical activation using electroencephalography (EEG) while measuring knee laxity using a knee arthrometer. The relationship between cortical activation and joint laxity within group was also examined. The ACLR patients had increased cortical activation (36.4% ± 11.5%) in the somatosensory cortex during early loading (ERD1) to the injured limb compared to the CONT's matched limb (25.3% ± 13.2%, P = 0.013) as well as compared to the noninjured limb (25.1% ± 14.2%, P = 0.001). Higher somatosensory cortical activity during midloading (ERD2) to the ACLR knee positively correlated with knee laxity (mm) during early loading (LAX1, r = 0.530), midloading (LAX2, r = 0.506), total anterior loading (LAXA, r = 0.543), and total antero‐posterior loading (LAXT, r = 0.501), while the noninjured limb revealed negative correlations between ERD1 and LAXA ( r = −0.534) as well as between ERD2 and LAX2 ( r = −0.565). ACLR patients demonstrate greater brain activation during joint loading in the injured knees when compared to healthy controls' matched knees as well as contralateral healthy knees, while the CONT group shows similar brain activation patterns during joint loading between limbs. These different neural activation strategies may indicate neuromechanical decoupling following an ACL reconstruction and evidence of altered sensorimotor perception and control of the knee (neuroplasticity), which may be critical to address after surgery for optimal neuromuscular control and patients' outcomes.