85. Treatment of hepatocarcinoma with 90Y glass microspheres: Safety and indication of prolonged overall survival thanks to two compartment dosimetric treatment planning. (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 85. Treatment of hepatocarcinoma with 90Y glass microspheres: Safety and indication of prolonged overall survival thanks to two compartment dosimetric treatment planning. (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- 85. Treatment of hepatocarcinoma with 90Y glass microspheres: Safety and indication of prolonged overall survival thanks to two compartment dosimetric treatment planning
- Authors:
- Chiesa, C.
Mira, M.
Maccauro, M.
Spreafico, C.
Cascella, T.
Sposito, C.
Bhoori, S.
De Nile, M.C.
Seregni, E.
Marchianò, A.
Crippa, F.
Mazzaferro, V. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To check the impact on toxicity and on overall survival (OS) of a personalized two compartment (tumor vs non tumor) dosimetric treatment planning method in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma with 90 Y glass microspheres. Methods: 43 Child A strictly selected patients (series 1) had been previously treated with 90 Y glass microspheres according to the standard mono-compartment planning of 120 Gy to the injected liver lobe. A retrospective analysis of 99m Tc-MAA pre-treatment SPECT/CT images had allowed to determine NTCP and TCP[1] . A decompensation risk of 15% was adopted as planning limit, corresponding to NTCP15 = 75 Gy. Liver absorbed dose is averaged on the organ volume excluding tumors. Such planning method was then applied to 116 less selected Child A patients (series 3, comparable to series 1). Results: With respect to series 1, administered activity in series 3 was doubled in half of patients, reduced of 50% in a quarter of patients. Toxicity rate was maintained below 15%. Patient were stratified as advanced (with Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT)) vs intermediate (NO PVT). In the PVT subgroups, lesions had the same size distribution. Treatment planning improved median OS from 8 to 12 months (with Mantel Cox test (p = 0.067) i.e. close to significance). In the NO PVT subgroups the median OS was 17 vs 15 months (n.s.) i.e. maintained, despite the larger tumor sizes. Conclusions: methodological limits were absence of scatter correction and mismatchAbstract : Purpose: To check the impact on toxicity and on overall survival (OS) of a personalized two compartment (tumor vs non tumor) dosimetric treatment planning method in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma with 90 Y glass microspheres. Methods: 43 Child A strictly selected patients (series 1) had been previously treated with 90 Y glass microspheres according to the standard mono-compartment planning of 120 Gy to the injected liver lobe. A retrospective analysis of 99m Tc-MAA pre-treatment SPECT/CT images had allowed to determine NTCP and TCP[1] . A decompensation risk of 15% was adopted as planning limit, corresponding to NTCP15 = 75 Gy. Liver absorbed dose is averaged on the organ volume excluding tumors. Such planning method was then applied to 116 less selected Child A patients (series 3, comparable to series 1). Results: With respect to series 1, administered activity in series 3 was doubled in half of patients, reduced of 50% in a quarter of patients. Toxicity rate was maintained below 15%. Patient were stratified as advanced (with Portal Vein Thrombosis (PVT)) vs intermediate (NO PVT). In the PVT subgroups, lesions had the same size distribution. Treatment planning improved median OS from 8 to 12 months (with Mantel Cox test (p = 0.067) i.e. close to significance). In the NO PVT subgroups the median OS was 17 vs 15 months (n.s.) i.e. maintained, despite the larger tumor sizes. Conclusions: methodological limits were absence of scatter correction and mismatch between simulation and 90 Y PET dosimetry. Results are really encouraging, since are the first indications of improved outcome thanks to dosimetric treatment planning. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Physica medica. Volume 56(2018)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Physica medica
- Issue:
- Volume 56(2018)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0056-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 114
- Page End:
- 115
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Imagerie médicale -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Rayons X -- Sécurité -- Mesures -- Périodiques
Physique -- Périodiques
Médecine -- Périodiques
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/11201797 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.physicamedica.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.04.095 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1120-1797
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6475.070000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9408.xml