Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed HIV‐infected patients in clinical practice: results from a multicentre, observational study. Issue 2 (20th November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed HIV‐infected patients in clinical practice: results from a multicentre, observational study. Issue 2 (20th November 2018)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed HIV‐infected patients in clinical practice: results from a multicentre, observational study
- Authors:
- Baldin, G
Ciccullo, A
Capetti, A
Rusconi, S
Sterrantino, G
Cossu, MV
Giacomelli, A
Lagi, F
Latini, A
Bagella, P
De Luca, A
Di Giambenedetto, S
Madeddu, G - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching antiretroviral therapy to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with those of switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in clinical practice. Methods: In a multicentre real‐life observational study, we analysed data for HIV‐infected patients on antiretroviral treatment with viral load < 50 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF (dolutegravir group) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF (elvitegravir group). Follow‐up was censored at 48 weeks. Results: The 48‐week estimated proportion maintaining virological efficacy was 96.1% with dolutegravir ( n = 123) and 95.4% with elvitegravir ( n = 186; P = 0.941). Patients in the dolutegravir group showed more treatment discontinuations, but these were mainly as a result of simplification. The elvitegravir group showed more discontinuations because of renal adverse events (2.7% versus 0% with dolutegravir). Interestingly, no difference was observed between the two regimens in central nervous system toxicity‐related discontinuations. Switching to dolutegravir was associated with a better blood lipid profile. Conclusions: Switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF was associated with similar efficacy and tolerability to switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed patients in clinical practice, although reasons forAbstract : Objectives: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching antiretroviral therapy to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with those of switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in clinical practice. Methods: In a multicentre real‐life observational study, we analysed data for HIV‐infected patients on antiretroviral treatment with viral load < 50 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF (dolutegravir group) or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF (elvitegravir group). Follow‐up was censored at 48 weeks. Results: The 48‐week estimated proportion maintaining virological efficacy was 96.1% with dolutegravir ( n = 123) and 95.4% with elvitegravir ( n = 186; P = 0.941). Patients in the dolutegravir group showed more treatment discontinuations, but these were mainly as a result of simplification. The elvitegravir group showed more discontinuations because of renal adverse events (2.7% versus 0% with dolutegravir). Interestingly, no difference was observed between the two regimens in central nervous system toxicity‐related discontinuations. Switching to dolutegravir was associated with a better blood lipid profile. Conclusions: Switching to dolutegravir + emtricitabine/TDF was associated with similar efficacy and tolerability to switching to elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/TDF in virologically suppressed patients in clinical practice, although reasons for discontinuation showed differences between regimens. These results should be interpreted with caution, as this is a nonrandomized comparison. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- HIV medicine. Volume 20:Issue 2(2019)
- Journal:
- HIV medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 2(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 2 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0020-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 164
- Page End:
- 168
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11-20
- Subjects:
- dolutegravir -- efficacy -- elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir/emtricitabine -- safety -- tenofovir/emtricitabine
HIV infections -- Treatment -- Periodicals
HIV-positive persons -- Periodicals
HIV infections -- Treatment -- Decision making -- Periodicals
616.9792 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=hiv ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-1293 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/hiv.12688 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1464-2662
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4319.045900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9417.xml