A comparative analysis of multiaxial fatigue models under random loading. (1st March 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparative analysis of multiaxial fatigue models under random loading. (1st March 2019)
- Main Title:
- A comparative analysis of multiaxial fatigue models under random loading
- Authors:
- Portugal, Ibai
Olave, Mireia
Urresti, Iker
Zurutuza, Aitor
López, Arkaitz
Muñiz-Calvente, Miguel
Fernández-Canteli, Alfonso - Abstract:
- Highlights: The different multiaxial models applied are demonstrated as reasonable candidates. McD is the most conservative. Findley, FS and BM criteria are the least in order. Orthogonal shear proves to underestimate the damage compared to the other models. The influence of the initial ball position proves to exert big influence on damage. The advances in bearings design could be extended to other industrial components. Abstract: A number of structural components, such as those related to wind turbines, are permanently subject to randomly varying load conditions during their service life and are therefore exposed to fatigue failure hazards. For this reason, the use of models for lifetime prediction is indispensable to ensure the structural integrity of at component and the correct operation conditions during its service life. This article compares different multiaxial fatigue criteria, in order to promote a secure and optimal design. Orthogonal shear stress and critical plane models based on stresses (e.g., McDiarmid and Findley), strains (e.g., Brown-Miller) and energy (e.g., Fatemi-Socie and Smith-Watson-Topper) are therefore considered. With this goal, the effect of randomly distributed load histories is analysed using a novel methodology based on the calculation of the stress tensor as a function of time, by interpolating loads with those obtained from response surfaces using Finite Element Method (FEM) models. The critical values of the selected parameters involved inHighlights: The different multiaxial models applied are demonstrated as reasonable candidates. McD is the most conservative. Findley, FS and BM criteria are the least in order. Orthogonal shear proves to underestimate the damage compared to the other models. The influence of the initial ball position proves to exert big influence on damage. The advances in bearings design could be extended to other industrial components. Abstract: A number of structural components, such as those related to wind turbines, are permanently subject to randomly varying load conditions during their service life and are therefore exposed to fatigue failure hazards. For this reason, the use of models for lifetime prediction is indispensable to ensure the structural integrity of at component and the correct operation conditions during its service life. This article compares different multiaxial fatigue criteria, in order to promote a secure and optimal design. Orthogonal shear stress and critical plane models based on stresses (e.g., McDiarmid and Findley), strains (e.g., Brown-Miller) and energy (e.g., Fatemi-Socie and Smith-Watson-Topper) are therefore considered. With this goal, the effect of randomly distributed load histories is analysed using a novel methodology based on the calculation of the stress tensor as a function of time, by interpolating loads with those obtained from response surfaces using Finite Element Method (FEM) models. The critical values of the selected parameters involved in the failure criterion, once estimated, are considered as references and used to determine the fatigue damage based on the Wöhler curves of the material. The methodology proposed allows the most suitable multiaxial fatigue criterion to be recognised by comparing predicted and experimental lab fatigue lives and levels of safety reserve. In this way, a methodology is provided to advance in the optimal test fitting and lifetime prediction of components under real fatigue conditions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Engineering structures. Volume 182(2019)
- Journal:
- Engineering structures
- Issue:
- Volume 182(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 182, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 182
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0182-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 112
- Page End:
- 122
- Publication Date:
- 2019-03-01
- Subjects:
- Component design -- Critical plane -- Multiaxial fatigue -- Non-proportional loading
Structural engineering -- Periodicals
Structural analysis (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Construction, Technique de la -- Périodiques
Génie parasismique -- Périodiques
Pression du vent -- Périodiques
Earthquake engineering
Structural engineering
Wind-pressure
Periodicals
624.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01410296 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.035 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0141-0296
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3770.032000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9389.xml