Elections as a democratic linkage mechanism: How elections boost political trust in a proportional system. (December 2016) - Hooghe, Marc
Abstract: Elections offer a privileged moment in representative democracy, when citizens have the opportunity to express their views, both on the track record of the incumbent government, as on the way the country should be governed in the future. Procedural fairness theory assumes that taking part in a decision making procedure that is perceived to be fair, strengthens the legitimacy of the entire process. Most of the empirical research assumes that the attitudinal effects of elections are mainly due to the fact that one's preferred party wins the elections. In multi-party systems, however, such a clear distinction is not always possible and therefore it is hypothesized that the winner-loser-logic is weaker in this kind of party system. In this study we rely on a unique Belgian panel study to ascertain how electoral participation has an effect on political trust. The results show that in a proportional system all voters rise in political trust following their participation in elections. The winner-loser effect is not significant. Furthermore, the analyses suggest that especially the respondents with the initially lowest trust levels gain most by participating in elections. The theoretical implication of this finding is that apparently elections are still considered to be an important and legitimate linkage mechanism between citizens and the political system. Highlights: Elections have a positive impact on political trust. Relying on procedural fairness theory this should account for both winners and losers. Analyses confirm that participation in elections increases political trust. There is no difference in increase in trust for winners or losers of the elections. Especially less-trusting voters seem to benefit from electoral participation.