Dose reconstruction for real‐time patient‐specific dose estimation in CT. Issue 5 (14th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: De Man, Bruno; Wu, Mingye; FitzGerald, Paul; Kalra, Mannudeep; Yin, Zhye
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 42:Issue 5(2015)
• Page Start: 2740
• Page End: 2751
• Publication Date: 2015-05-14
• Subjects: computerised tomography -- dosimetry -- image reconstruction -- medical image processing; Dosimetry/exposure assessment -- Reconstruction; Computerised tomographs -- Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers -- Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications -- Image data processing or generation, in general -- Scintigraphy; computed tomography -- radiation dose estimation; Dosimetry -- Computed tomography -- Monte Carlo methods -- Anatomy -- X‐ray detectors -- Particle beam detectors -- X‐ray scattering -- Medical X‐ray imaging; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4921066
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Many recent computed tomography (CT) dose reduction approaches belong to one of three categories: statistical reconstruction algorithms, efficient x‐ray detectors, and optimized CT acquisition schemes with precise control over the x‐ray distribution. The latter category could greatly benefit from fast and accurate methods for dose estimation, which would enable real‐time patient‐specific protocol optimization. Methods: The authors present a new method for volumetrically reconstructing absorbed dose on a per‐voxel basis, directly from the actual CT images. The authors' specific implementation combines a distance‐driven pencil‐beam approach to model the first‐order x‐ray interactions with a set of Gaussian convolution kernels to model the higher‐order x‐ray interactions. The authors performed a number of 3D simulation experiments comparing the proposed method to a Monte Carlo based ground truth. Results: The authors' results indicate that the proposed approach offers a good trade‐off between accuracy and computational efficiency. The images show a good qualitative correspondence to Monte Carlo estimates. Preliminary quantitative results show errors below 10%, except in bone regions, where the authors see a bigger model mismatch. The computational complexity is similar to that of a low‐resolution filtered‐backprojection algorithm. Conclusions: The authors present a method for analytic dose reconstruction in CT, similar to the techniques used in radiation therapy planning with megavoltage energies. Future work will include refinements of the proposed method to improve the accuracy as well as a more extensive validation study. The proposed method is not intended to replace methods that track individual x‐ray photons, but the authors expect that it may prove useful in applications where real‐time patient‐specific dose estimation is required.