Systematic review with meta‐analysis: endoscopic dilation is highly effective and safe in children and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis. Issue 2 (17th May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Systematic review with meta‐analysis: endoscopic dilation is highly effective and safe in children and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis. Issue 2 (17th May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Systematic review with meta‐analysis: endoscopic dilation is highly effective and safe in children and adults with eosinophilic oesophagitis
- Authors:
- Moawad, F. J.
Molina‐Infante, J.
Lucendo, A. J.
Cantrell, S. E.
Tmanova, L.
Douglas, K. M. - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: Oesophageal dilation is frequently used as an adjunct treatment to alleviate symptoms that develop from fibrostenotic remodelling in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Earlier reports described an increased risk of complications associated with dilation. Aim: Perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilation in children and adults with EoE. Methods: Professional librarians searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles in any language describing studies of dilation in EoE through December 2016. Studies were selected and data were abstracted independently and in duplicate. Random effects modelling was used to generate summary estimates for clinical improvement and complications (haemorrhage, perforation, hospitalisation, and death). Results: The search resulted in 3495 references, of which 27 studies were included in the final analysis. The studies described 845 EoE patients, including 87 paediatric patients, who underwent a total of 1820 oesophageal dilations. The median number of dilations was 3 (range: 1‐35). Clinical improvement occurred in 95% of patients (95% CI: 90%‐98%, I 2 : 10%, 17 studies). Perforation occurred in 0.38% (95% CI: 0.18%‐0.85%, I 2 : 0%, 27 studies), haemorrhage in 0.05% (95% CI: 0%‐0.3%, I 2 : 0%, 18 studies), and hospitalisation in 0.67% (95% CI: 0.3%‐1.1%, I 2 : 44%, 24 studies). No deaths occurred (95% CI: 0%‐0.2% I 2 : 0%, 25 studies).Summary: Background: Oesophageal dilation is frequently used as an adjunct treatment to alleviate symptoms that develop from fibrostenotic remodelling in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE). Earlier reports described an increased risk of complications associated with dilation. Aim: Perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic dilation in children and adults with EoE. Methods: Professional librarians searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles in any language describing studies of dilation in EoE through December 2016. Studies were selected and data were abstracted independently and in duplicate. Random effects modelling was used to generate summary estimates for clinical improvement and complications (haemorrhage, perforation, hospitalisation, and death). Results: The search resulted in 3495 references, of which 27 studies were included in the final analysis. The studies described 845 EoE patients, including 87 paediatric patients, who underwent a total of 1820 oesophageal dilations. The median number of dilations was 3 (range: 1‐35). Clinical improvement occurred in 95% of patients (95% CI: 90%‐98%, I 2 : 10%, 17 studies). Perforation occurred in 0.38% (95% CI: 0.18%‐0.85%, I 2 : 0%, 27 studies), haemorrhage in 0.05% (95% CI: 0%‐0.3%, I 2 : 0%, 18 studies), and hospitalisation in 0.67% (95% CI: 0.3%‐1.1%, I 2 : 44%, 24 studies). No deaths occurred (95% CI: 0%‐0.2% I 2 : 0%, 25 studies). Conclusions: Endoscopic dilation is consistently effective in children and adults with EoE, resulting in improvement in 95% of patients with very low rates (<1%) of major complications. Abstract : Linked Content This article is linked to Moaward et al and Kia and Hirano papers. To view these articles visithttps://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14216 andhttps://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14213 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics. Volume 46:Issue 2(2017)
- Journal:
- Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics
- Issue:
- Volume 46:Issue 2(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 46, Issue 2 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0046-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 96
- Page End:
- 105
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05-17
- Subjects:
- Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Effect of drugs on -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal system -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal system -- Effect of drugs on -- Periodicals
615.73 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2036 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/apt.14123 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0269-2813
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0787.886000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9343.xml