Technical Note: Procedure for the calibration and validation of kilo‐voltage cone‐beam CT models. Issue 9 (24th August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vilches‐Freixas, Gloria; Létang, Jean Michel; Brousmiche, Sébastien; Romero, Edward; Vila Oliva, Marc; Kellner, Daniel; Deutschmann, Heinz; Keuschnigg, Peter; Steininger, Philipp; Rit, Simon
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 43:Issue 9(2016)
• Page Start: 5199
• Page End: 5204
• Publication Date: 2016-08-24
• Subjects: calibration -- computerised tomography -- dosimetry -- sensitivity analysis; Computed tomography -- Standards and calibration -- Dosimetry/exposure assessment -- Dose‐volume analysis; Computerised tomographs -- Testing or calibrating of apparatus or arrangements provided for in groups G01D1/00 to G01D15/00 -- Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers -- Calibrating of instruments or apparatus -- Scintigraphy; digital imaging -- validation procedure -- model calibration -- x‐ray spectra -- detector response; Image detection systems -- Image sensors -- Aluminium -- Cone beam computed tomography -- Scintillation detectors -- Computer modeling -- Calibration -- Copper -- Photons -- Medical imaging; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4961400
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: The aim of this work is to propose a general and simple procedure for the calibration and validation of kilo‐voltage cone‐beam CT (kV CBCT) models against experimental data. Methods: The calibration and validation of the CT model is a two‐step procedure: the source model then the detector model. The source is described by the direction dependent photon energy spectrum at each voltage while the detector is described by the pixel intensity value as a function of the direction and the energy of incident photons. The measurements for the source consist of a series of dose measurements in air performed at each voltage with varying filter thicknesses and materials in front of the x‐ray tube. The measurements for the detector are acquisitions of projection images using the same filters and several tube voltages. The proposed procedure has been applied to calibrate and assess the accuracy of simple models of the source and the detector of three commercial kV CBCT units. If the CBCT system models had been calibrated differently, the current procedure would have been exclusively used to validate the models. Several high‐purity attenuation filters of aluminum, copper, and silver combined with a dosimeter which is sensitive to the range of voltages of interest were used. A sensitivity analysis of the model has also been conducted for each parameter of the source and the detector models. Results: Average deviations between experimental and theoretical dose values are below 1.5% after calibration for the three x‐ray sources. The predicted energy deposited in the detector agrees with experimental data within 4% for all imaging systems. Conclusions: The authors developed and applied an experimental procedure to calibrate and validate any model of the source and the detector of a CBCT unit. The present protocol has been successfully applied to three x‐ray imaging systems. The minimum requirements in terms of material and equipment would make its implementation suitable in most clinical environments.