Imposing Death: Religious Witness on Brain Death. (25th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Campbell, Courtney S.
• Editors: Truog, Robert D.; Berlinger, Nancy; Zacharias, Rachel L.; Solomon, Mildred Z.
• Is Part Of: Hastings Center report. Volume 48(2018)Supplement 4
• Page Start: S56
• Page End: S59
• Publication Date: 2018-12-25
• Subjects: Medical ethics -- Periodicals; Bioethics -- Periodicals; 174.205
• DOI: 10.1002/hast.957
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0093-0334

Abstract

Abstract: The bioethical, professional, and policy discourse over brain death criteria has been portrayed by some scholars as illustrative of the minimal influence of religious perspectives in bioethics. Three questions then lie at the core of my inquiry: What interests of secular pluralistic societies and the medical profession are advanced in examining religious understandings of criteria for determining death? Can bioethical and professional engagement with religious interpretations of death present substantive insights for policy discussions on neurological criteria for death? And finally, how extensive should the scope of policy accommodations be for deeply held religiously based dissent from neurological criteria for death? I begin with a short synopsis of a recent case litigated in Ontario, Canada, Ouanounou v. Humber River Hospital, to illuminate this contested moral terrain .