Algorithmic scatter correction in dual‐energy digital mammography. Issue 11 (25th October 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Xi; Nishikawa, Robert M.; Chan, Suk‐tak; Lau, Beverly A.; Zhang, Lei; Mou, Xuanqin
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 40:Issue 11(2013)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2013-10-25
• Subjects: Digital mammography -- Noise -- Contrast -- Cancer -- Interpolation; curve fitting; biological tissues -- cancer -- image denoising -- interpolation -- mammography -- medical image processing -- phantoms; dual energy -- mammography -- scatter correction -- calcification; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers -- Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications -- Image data processing or generation, in general -- Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit‐mapped to bit‐mapped creating a similar image; Medical imaging -- X‐ray scattering -- Digital mammography -- Interpolation -- Mammography -- Calibration -- Medical X‐ray imaging -- Tissues -- Medical image noise -- Quantum noise; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4826173
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: : Small calcifications are often the earliest and the main indicator of breast cancer. Dual‐energy digital mammography (DEDM) has been considered as a promising technique to improve the detectability of calcifications since it can be used to suppress the contrast between adipose and glandular tissues of the breast. X‐ray scatter leads to erroneous calculations of the DEDM image. Although the pinhole‐array interpolation method can estimate scattered radiations, it requires extra exposures to measure the scatter and apply the correction. The purpose of this work is to design an algorithmic method for scatter correction in DEDM without extra exposures. Methods: : In this paper, a scatter correction method for DEDM was developed based on the knowledge that scattered radiation has small spatial variation and that the majority of pixels in a mammogram are noncalcification pixels. The scatter fraction was estimated in the DEDM calculation and the measured scatter fraction was used to remove scatter from the image. The scatter correction method was implemented on a commercial full‐field digital mammography system with breast tissue equivalent phantom and calcification phantom. The authors also implemented the pinhole‐array interpolation scatter correction method on the system. Phantom results for both methods are presented and discussed. The authors compared the background DE calcification signals and the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of calcifications in the three DE calcification images: image without scatter correction, image with scatter correction using pinhole‐array interpolation method, and image with scatter correction using the authorsˈ algorithmic method. Results: : The authorsˈ results show that the resultant background DE calcification signal can be reduced. The root‐mean‐square of background DE calcification signal of 1962 μ m with scatter‐uncorrected data was reduced to 194 μ m after scatter correction using the authorsˈ algorithmic method. The range of background DE calcification signals using scatter‐uncorrected data was reduced by 58% with scatter‐corrected data by algorithmic method. With the scatter‐correction algorithm and denoising, the minimum visible calcification size can be reduced from 380 to 280 μ m. Conclusions: : When applying the proposed algorithmic scatter correction to images, the resultant background DE calcification signals can be reduced and the CNR of calcifications can be improved. This method has similar or even better performance than pinhole‐array interpolation method in scatter correction for DEDM; moreover, this method is convenient and requires no extra exposure to the patient. Although the proposed scatter correction method is effective, it is validated by a 5‐cm‐thick phantom with calcifications and homogeneous background. The method should be tested on structured backgrounds to more accurately gauge effectiveness.