A multicenter, prospective evaluation of the Chinese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scoring System for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Issue 173 (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luo, Lili; Wu, Yingying; Niu, Ting; Han, Yue; Feng, Ying; Ding, Qiulan; Huang, Ruibin; Zhang, Xiaohui; Feng, Jianming; Hou, Ming; Peng, Jun; Li, Yan; Zhou, Yuhong; Su, Lei; Yang, Linhua; Zhou, Zeping; Xue, Feng; Gu, Jian; Zhu, Tienan; Wang, Xiaomin; Deng, Jun; Mei, Heng; Hu, Yu
• Is Part Of: Thrombosis research. Issue 173(2019)
• Page Start: 131
• Page End: 140
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: DIC disseminated intravascular coagulation -- CDSS the Chinese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis scoring system for DIC -- ISTH the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis -- JMHW the Japanese Ministry Health and Welfare -- JAAM the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine -- SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment -- APACHE Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation -- ROC receiver operating characteristic -- AUC area under ROC curves -- PT prothrombin time -- FDP fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product -- APTT activated partial thromboplastin time -- ORs odds ratios -- CIs confidence intervals -- APS anti-phospholipid syndrome -- TTP thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura -- HIT heparin-induced thrombocytopenia -- AML acute myeloid leukemia -- ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia -- MDS myelodysplastic syndromes; Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) -- Diagnosis -- Prognosis -- Criteria -- Scoring system; Thrombosis -- Periodicals; 616.135
• DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.11.022
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0049-3848

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a severe complication of critical conditions. There are several scoring systems used for the diagnosis of DIC, including the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) Overt-DIC criteria, the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) criteria and the Chinese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis scoring system for DIC (CDSS). The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy and predictive value of the CDSS. Materials and methods: 1318 patients, aged 18–70 years old and suspected of DIC were enrolled from 18 hospitals across China. Participants were divided into two groups for analysis (group 1, non-hematological diseases; group 2, hematological diseases). 242 patients were excluded because of incomplete data collection and failure to follow-up. Results and conclusions: The rates of concordance of diagnosis of DIC between the CDSS and two other scoring systems were close to 80%. The area under ROC curves of CDSS had a slight advantage when using the ISTH, JMHW criteria or prognosis as gold standard, respectively. The CDSS DIC was an independent predictor of mortality, and its odds-ratio was superior or comparable to that of the ISTH and JMHW criteria in the two groups. The CDSS DIC score also had a significant correlation with the APACHE II and SOFA score ( p < 0.05). In summary, as a quantification standard of the Chinese experts' consensus, the CDSS is conducive to the standardized diagnosis of DIC because of its favorable diagnostic and prognostic utility. Highlights: The diagnostic rates for DIC from the three scoring systems varied with different illnesses. The rates of concordance in the diagnosis of DIC between the CDSS and other two scoring systems were close to 80%. When the ISTH, JMHW and prognosis was used as the gold standard, the AUC for CDSS had a slight advantage over the two others. The CDSS DIC was an independent predictor of mortality, and the CDSS score may reflect DIC severity.