Sex differences in postprandial glucose response to short bouts of exercise: A randomized controlled trial. Issue 2 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bartholomae, Eric M.; Moore, Jeff; Ward, Kathryn; Kressler, Jochen
• Is Part Of: Journal of science and medicine in sport. Volume 22:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 181
• Page End: 185
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: AUC area under the curve -- BMI body mass index -- CHO carbohydrate -- GE gross efficiency -- HbA1c glycated hemoglobin -- iAUC incremental area under the curve -- OGTT oral glucose tolerance test -- PPG postprandial blood glucose -- RPE rating of perceived exertion -- VO2max maximal oxygen consumption; Sex differences -- Blood glucose -- Metabolic response -- Exercise -- Diabetes -- Hyperglycemia; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- physiology -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Sportgeneeskunde; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-2440

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess sex differences in PPG responses to short stair stepping bouts, and to describe their intensity and metabolic cost. Design: Crossover trial. Methods: 34 participants (age: 25.9 ± 5.5 y; women = 14) underwent 4 oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) during rest or with stair-stepping bouts at self-selected, moderate pace for 1, 3, and 10 min. Blood was collected every 15 min during the OGTTs and assessed for glucose. Participants also underwent maximal aerobic capacity assessment. Expired gases were collected during capacity testing, and each stair-stepping bout. Results: Normalized to body weight there was no significant interaction for sex with stair-stepping trials (p = 0.445, ηp 2 = 0.03), or time (p = 0.069, ηp 2 = 0.09), or trial by time (p = 0.264, ηp 2 = 0.04). Women had higher mean glucose values than men (15(CI = 3, 27)%, p = 0.015). iAUC also showed no interaction of sex*trial (p = 0.059, ηp 2 = 0.09). Women had higher iAUC values ( mean Δ = −29(−48, −11)%, p = 0.003). There was a main effect for trial with 10min showing the largest reduction from control for women (e.g. AUC −10(−6, −13)%, p < .001) and men (−8(2, 13)%, p = .010). Metabolic cost of the stair stepping bouts showed no interaction of sex*trial (p = 0.715, ηp 2 = 0.01) and no difference between sexes ( mean Δ = −1.3(−5.9, 3.4)%, p = 0.571). Intensity was higher for women for the 3 min (60 ± 11 vs. 48 ± 9%VO2 max, p = 0.003) and 10 min (67 ± 8 vs. 54 ± 12%VO2 max, p = 0.002) bouts. Moreover, both sexes underestimated the true intensity of stepping. Conclusions: Both sexes had similar responses to short bouts of exercise, which they perceived as less intense than indicated by objective assessment. Stair stepping reduces postprandial glucose response with similar effectiveness for both sexes. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03400774.