Radiographer mammographers' attitudes towards implementing new techniques for imaging the augmented breast, after viewing a training DVD or receiving cascade training: A survey. Issue 1 (February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moneme, N.C.; Curtis, J.
• Is Part Of: Radiography. Volume 25:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 45
• Publication Date: 2019-02
• Subjects: Augmented breast -- Eklund technique -- DVD -- Mammographers -- Attitude -- Cascade training; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2018.07.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-8174

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Mammographers in the NHSBSP are required to implement the Eklund ('Pushback') technique after viewing a training DVD or receiving cascade training. This study aims to evaluate Radiographers' attitudes towards imaging the augmented breast following viewing the training DVD or receiving cascade training. Methodology: Questionnaires containing both open and closed questions collected quantitative and qualitative data across three breast screening units. A total of 60 radiographers were targeted. Their responses were analysed using Pearson's Chi–Square. An evaluation of likelihood and association of variables was performed using inferential statistics. Results: Of the 60 mammographers targeted, 38 (63%) completed the questionnaires. Quantitative results indicated that most mammographers (78%) had watched the DVD. Of these responders, (51.14%) found the DVD somewhat helpful in raising their confidence to attempt the new techniques. When inferential statistics was used to evaluate if confidence was associated with location or level of qualifications, these showed no significance ('p' = 0.085 and 0.312 respectively). Results indicated that longer years of practice had an association with ability to attempt techniques, however, this was not statistically significant (χ 2 = 3.939, df = 6, p = 0.685). Qualitative responses indicated that cascade training increased confidence more than viewing the DVD. Both qualitative and quantitative data indicated that cascade training in addition to the DVD is required. Conclusion: Although the DVD was a helpful training tool, it did not sufficiently raise confidence for all viewers. Cascaded training in addition to the DVD was required to effectively raise confidence. Highlights: DVD aids training. However, 'hands-on' training from colleagues improved confidence more among mammographers. Length of practice and level of qualification are key factors influencing confidence to attempt the Eklund technique. When circulating training tools, providing guidelines on dissemination methods may optimize training results.