Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China. (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ma, Ben; Cai, Zhen; Zheng, Jie; Wen, Yali
• Is Part Of: World development. Volume 115(2019)
• Page Start: 236
• Page End: 244
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: Protected area -- Gini coefficient -- Matching estimates -- Giant panda nature reserves; Economic history -- 1990- -- Periodicals; Economic assistance -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 330.9
• DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.017
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-750X

Abstract

Highlights: Nature reserves (NRs) significantly reduce the net income of households within them. NRs aggravate income inequality in local communities. Ecotourism can reduce poverty but increases income inequality, especially for households within NRs. We find that NRs with ecotourism can have a positive effect on local livelihood but aggravate income inequality. Abstract: The impacts of nature reserves (NRs) and ecotourism on local economies are considered controversial. By surveying households residing inside and outside of six giant panda NRs in the Qinling Mountains from 2015 to 2017, this study evaluates the impacts of NRs and ecotourism on the poverty and income inequality of local communities in China. Our results suggest that the local communities of NRs show higher poverty and lower income levels compared to the national average. NRs significantly reduced the net income of households residing within the NRs, and most of these reductions are caused by converting cropland to conservation land. NRs also aggravated the income inequality of local communities, and the level of inequality inside NRs was significantly higher than that outside. In terms of the impacts from ecotourism, ecotourism can reduce poverty, but it increases income inequality, especially for those households residing within NRs.