Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting. Issue 100 (March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Spuur, Kelly; Webb, Jodi; Poulos, Ann; Nielsen, Sharon; Robinson, Wayne
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 100(2018)
• Page Start: 76
• Page End: 84
• Publication Date: 2018-03
• Subjects: Mammography -- Image quality -- PGMI -- Image evaluation systems -- Full field digital mammography FFDM -- Mediolateral oblique -- Inframammary angle -- Inframammary fold -- IMA -- Evidence based practice -- Breast cancer -- Breast imaging; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the clinical rates of the demonstration of the inframammary angle (IMA) on the mediolateral oblique (MLO) view of the breast on digital mammograms and to compare the outcomes with current accreditation standards for compliance. Relationships between the IMA, age, the posterior nipple line (PNL) and compressed breast thickness will be identified and the study outcomes validated using appropriate analyses of inter-reader and inter-rater reliability and variability. Differences in left versus right data were also investigated. Method: A quantitative retrospective study of 2270 randomly selected paired digital mammograms performed by BreastScreen NSW was undertaken. Data was collected by direct measurement and visual analysis. Intra-class correlation analyses were used to evaluate inter- and intra-rater reliability. Results: The IMA was demonstrated on 52.4% of individual and 42.6% of paired mammograms. A linear relationship was found between the posterior nipple line (PNL) and age (p-value <0.001). The PNL was predicted to increase by 0.48 mm for every one year increment in age. The odds of demonstrating the IMA reduced by 2% for every one year increase in age (p-value = 0.001); are 0.4% higher for every 1 mm increase in PNL (p-value = 0.001) and 1.6% lower for every 1 mm increase in compressed breast thickness, (p-value<0.001). There was high inter- and intra-rater reliability for the PNL while there was 100% agreement for the demonstration of the IMA. Conclusion: Analysis of the demonstration of the IMA indicates clinically achievable rates (42.6%) well below that required for compliance (50%–75%) to known worldwide accreditation standards for screening mammography. These standards should be aligned to the reported evidence base. Visualisation of the IMA is impacted negatively by increasing age and compressed breast thickness but positively by breast size (PNL).