Recipient Selection for Optimal Utilization of Discarded Grafts in Liver Transplantation. Issue 5 (May 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Recipient Selection for Optimal Utilization of Discarded Grafts in Liver Transplantation. Issue 5 (May 2018)
- Main Title:
- Recipient Selection for Optimal Utilization of Discarded Grafts in Liver Transplantation
- Authors:
- Giretti, Giovanni
Barbier, Louise
Bucur, Petru
Marques, Frédéric
Perarnau, Jean-Marc
Ferrandière, Martine
Tellier, Anne-Charlotte
Kerouredan, Vincent
Altieri, Mario
Causse, Xavier
Debette-Gratien, Maryline
Silvain, Christine
Salamé, Ephrem - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: In France, liver grafts that have been refused by at least 5 teams are considered for rescue allocation (RA), with the choice of the recipient being at the team's discretion. Although this system permits the use of otherwise discarded grafts in a context of organ shortage, outcomes and potential benefits need to be assessed. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, outcomes of RA grafts (n = 33) were compared with SA grafts (n = 321) at a single French center. Results: Liver grafts in the RA group were older (63 ± 17 years vs 54 ± 18 years, P = 0.007) and had a higher DRI (1.86 ± 0.45 vs 1.61 ± 0.47, P = 0.010). Recipients in this group had a lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (14 ± 5 vs 22 ± 10, P < 0.001) and had mostly hepatocellular carcinoma (67.0% vs 40.4%, P = 0.010). The balance of risk score was significantly lower in the RA group (5.5 ± 2.9 vs 9.2 ± 5.5, P < 0.001). There were higher rates of early and delayed hepatic artery thrombosis (15.2% vs 3.1%, P = 0.001) and retransplantation (18.2% vs 4.7%, P = 0.002) in the RA group. Patient survival was not different between groups, but graft survival was impaired (95% vs 82% at 1 year and 94% vs 74% at 3 years, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show that discarded liver grafts can be used provided that there is a strict recipient selection process, although hepatic artery thrombosis and retransplantation are more frequent. This strategy enables utilization of otherwise discarded grafts in theAbstract : Background: In France, liver grafts that have been refused by at least 5 teams are considered for rescue allocation (RA), with the choice of the recipient being at the team's discretion. Although this system permits the use of otherwise discarded grafts in a context of organ shortage, outcomes and potential benefits need to be assessed. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, outcomes of RA grafts (n = 33) were compared with SA grafts (n = 321) at a single French center. Results: Liver grafts in the RA group were older (63 ± 17 years vs 54 ± 18 years, P = 0.007) and had a higher DRI (1.86 ± 0.45 vs 1.61 ± 0.47, P = 0.010). Recipients in this group had a lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (14 ± 5 vs 22 ± 10, P < 0.001) and had mostly hepatocellular carcinoma (67.0% vs 40.4%, P = 0.010). The balance of risk score was significantly lower in the RA group (5.5 ± 2.9 vs 9.2 ± 5.5, P < 0.001). There were higher rates of early and delayed hepatic artery thrombosis (15.2% vs 3.1%, P = 0.001) and retransplantation (18.2% vs 4.7%, P = 0.002) in the RA group. Patient survival was not different between groups, but graft survival was impaired (95% vs 82% at 1 year and 94% vs 74% at 3 years, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Our results show that discarded liver grafts can be used provided that there is a strict recipient selection process, although hepatic artery thrombosis and retransplantation are more frequent. This strategy enables utilization of otherwise discarded grafts in the context of organ shortage. Abstract : In the French liver allocation system, grafts that are refused by 5 centers are available for use at the discretion of the center termed rescue allocation. In the authors' experience, these grafts are used with comparable patient survival but an increased risk of hepatic artery thrombosis and retransplantation. Strategies for improved outcomes are discussed. Supplemental digital content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Transplantation. Volume 102:Issue 5(2018)
- Journal:
- Transplantation
- Issue:
- Volume 102:Issue 5(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 5 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0102-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-05
- Subjects:
- Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals
Transplantation immunology -- Periodicals
617.95 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/TP.0000000000002069 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0041-1337
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9024.990000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9181.xml