Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?. (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Silverman, Jerald; Lidz, Charles W.; Clayfield, Jonathan; Murray, Alexandra; Simon, Lorna J.; Maranda, Louise
• Is Part Of: Journal of empirical research on human research ethics. Volume 12:Number 4(2017)
• Page Start: 209
• Page End: 216
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: IACUCs -- research ethics -- qualitative methods -- federal regulations -- research review; Medical ethics -- Research -- Periodicals; Research -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; 174.205
• DOI: 10.1177/1556264617717827
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1556-2646

Abstract

Decisions about the appropriate use of animals in research are largely made by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). Several commentators claim that scientists exert excessive influence on IACUC decisions. We studied 87 protocol reviews from 10 IACUCs to assess whether any group of participants appeared to dominate the protocol discussions. Audio recordings of the meetings were coded to capture the topics of the discussions. We found that animal research scientists made the largest total number of topic mentions while community members made the fewest. On a per person basis, chairpersons and attending veterinarians made the most mentions. Scientists presented the largest number of protocols, and the subsequent discussions tended to contain the same topics mentioned in the presentations. The large number of protocols presented by scientists and their total number of comments made during protocol discussions suggest that scientists may significantly influence IACUC decision making.