Early virological response to HIV treatment: can we predict who is likely to experience subsequent treatment failure? Results from an observational cohort study, London, UK. Issue 1 (30th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brima, Nataliya; Lampe, Fiona C.; Copas, Andrew; Gilson, Richard; Williams, Ian; Johnson, Margaret A.; Phillips, Andrew N.; Smith, Colette J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the International AIDS Society. Volume 20:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-08-30
• Subjects: initial virological response -- HIV -- ART -- response to ART -- HIV treatment -- VL response to ART; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Periodicals; 616.9792005
• DOI: 10.7448/IAS.20.1.21567
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-2652

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction : For people living with HIV, the first antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimen offers the best chance for a good virological response. Early identification of those unlikely to respond to first‐line ART could enable timely intervention and increase chances of a good initial treatment response. In this study we assess the extent to which the HIV RNA viral load (VL) at 1 and 3 months is predictive of first‐line treatment outcome at 6 months. Methods : All previously ART‐naive individuals starting ART at two London centres since 2000 with baseline (−180 to 3 days) VL >500 c/mL had a VL measurement between 6 and 12 months after starting ART, and at least one at month 1 (4–60 days) or month 3 (61–120 days) were included. Lack of treatment response was defined as (i) VL >200 copies/mL at 6 months or (ii) VL >200 copies/mL at 6 months or simultaneous switch in drugs from at least two different drug classes before 6 months. The association with VL measurements at 1 and 3 months post‐ART; change from pre‐ART in these values; and CD4 count measurements at 1 and 3 months were assessed using logistic regression models. The relative fit of the models was compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results : A total of 198 out of 3258 individuals (6%) experienced lack of treatment response at 6 months (definition i), increasing to 511 (16%) for definition (ii). Those with a 1‐month (day 4–60 window) VL of <1000, 1000–9999, 10, 000–99, 999 and >100, 000 copies/ml had a 4%, 8%, 23% and 24% chance, respectively, of subsequently experiencing treatment non‐response at 6 months (definition (i)). When considering the 3‐month (day 61–120 window) VL, the chances of subsequently experiencing treatment non‐response were, respectively, 3%, 25%, 67% and 75%. Results were similar for definition (ii). Conclusions : Whilst 3‐month VL provides good discrimination between low and high risk of treatment failure, 1‐month VL does not. Presence of a VL >10, 000 copies/ml after 3 months of ART is a cutoff above which individuals are at a sufficiently higher risk of non‐response that they may be considered for intervention.