Closing a window – opening a door: A response to the letter to the editor. Issue 8 (20th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilson, Adam B.; Lazarus, Michelle D.
• Is Part Of: Clinical anatomy. Volume 31:Issue 8(2018)
• Page Start: 1207
• Page End: 1209
• Publication Date: 2018-09-20
• Subjects: anatomy dissection -- meta‐analysis -- professional skill development; Anatomy -- Periodicals; Anatomy -- Periodicals; 611
• DOI: 10.1002/ca.23226
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0897-3806

Abstract

Abstract : In this response, the authors of "A meta‐analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies" (Wilson, 2018) make counter arguments to a letter submitted to the editor while encouraging academicians to consider a more modern perspective of anatomy education in the context of changing curricular models. While the authors agree the dissection laboratory is fertile ground for cultivating professional skill development, in more modern settings there are a myriad of outlets and experiences through which trainees can gain the necessary exposure to the same professional skills which are often touted as being informally developed in the anatomy laboratory. Overall, the authors advocate for closing the window on evaluating short‐term anatomy knowledge outcomes so that the door can be opened to evaluating the effects of dissection on long‐term knowledge gains and determining whether there are irreplaceable teaching advantages within hidden/informal curricula in the anatomy laboratory. Clin. Anat. 31:1207–1209, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.