Genome variations between rhizosphere and bulk soil ecotypes of a Pseudomonas koreensis population. (26th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lopes, Lucas Dantas; Pereira e Silva, Michele de C.; Weisberg, Alexandra J.; Davis, Edward W.; Yan, Qing; Varize, Camila de S.; Wu, Chih‐Feng; Chang, Jeff H.; Loper, Joyce E.; Andreote, Fernando D.
• Is Part Of: Environmental microbiology. Volume 20:Number 12(2018)
• Page Start: 4401
• Page End: 4414
• Publication Date: 2018-09-26
• Subjects: Microbial ecology -- Periodicals; Environmental Microbiology -- Periodicals; 579.17
• DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.14363
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-2912

Abstract

Summary: Bulk soil and rhizosphere are soil compartments selecting different microbial communities. However, it is unknown whether this selection also can change the genome content of specific bacterial taxa, splitting a population in distinct ecotypes. To answer this question we compared the genome sequences of 53 isolates obtained from sugarcane rhizosphere (28) and bulk soil (25). These isolates were previously classified in the Pseudomonas koreensis subgroup of the P. fluorescens complex. Phylogenomics showed a trend of separation between bulk soil and rhizosphere isolates. Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) identified differences in the accessory genome of rhizosphere and bulk soil sub‐populations. We found significant changes in gene frequencies distinguishing rhizosphere from bulk soil ecotypes, for example, enrichment of phosphatases and xylose utilization ( xut ) genes, respectively. Phenotypic assays and deletion of xutA gene indicated that accumulation of xut genes in the bulk soil sub‐population provided a higher growth capacity in ad ‐xylose medium, supporting the corresponding genomic differences. Despite the clear differences distinguishing the two ecotypes, all 53 isolates were classified in a single 16S rRNA gene OTU. Collectively, our results revealed that the gene pool and ecological behavior of a bacterial population can be different for ecotypes living in neighbouring soil habitats.