Efficacy of hypnosis on pain, wound-healing, anxiety, and stress in children with acute burn injuries: a randomized controlled trial. Issue 9 (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chester, Stephen J.; Tyack, Zephanie; De Young, Alexandra; Kipping, Belinda; Griffin, Bronwyn; Stockton, Kellie; Ware, Robert S.; Zhang, Xi; Kimble, Roy M.
• Is Part Of: Pain. Volume 159:Issue 9(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: Burns -- Child -- Hypnosis -- Pain -- Wound-healing -- Stress -- Anxiety -- Posttraumatic stress disorder -- Salivary α-amylase -- Randomized controlled trial; Pain -- Periodicals; Douleur -- Périodiques; Anesthésie -- Périodiques; Pain; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.0472
• DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001276
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0304-3959

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: No randomized controlled trial has investigated the efficacy of hypnosis for reducing pain and improving wound-healing in children with burns. This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate whether hypnosis decreases pain, anxiety, and stress and accelerates wound-healing in children undergoing burn wound procedures. Children (4-16 years) with acute burns presenting for their first dressing change were randomly assigned to a Hypnosis Group who received hypnosis plus standard care or a Standard Care Group who received standard pharmacological and nonpharmacological intervention. Repeated measures of pain intensity, anxiety, stress, and wound-healing were taken at dressing changes until ≥95% wound re-epithelialization. Data for 62 children were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis using Generalized Estimating Equations (n = 35 Standard Care Group; n = 27 Hypnosis Group). An effect on the primary outcomes of pain and wound healing was not supported {self-reported pain intensity largest Mean Difference [MD] = −0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.91 to 0.22), P = 0.12; MD for re-epithelialization = −0.46 [95% CI: −4.27 to 3.35], P = 0.81}. Some support was found for an effect on the secondary outcomes of preprocedural anxiety (MD = −0.80 [95% CI: −1.50 to −0.10], P = 0.03 before the second dressing change) and heart rate as a measure of stress (MD = −15.20 [−27.20 to −3.20], P = 0.01 and MD = −15.39 [−28.25 to −2.53], P = 0.02 before and after the third dressing change). Hypnosis may be effective for decreasing preprocedural anxiety and heart rate in children undergoing repeated pediatric wound care procedures but not for reducing pain intensity or accelerating wound healing. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.A randomized controlled trial demonstrated that hypnosis was not effective for reducing pain and improving re-epithelialization in children. Some support was found for decreasing preprocedural anxiety and heart rate in children undergoing wound care procedures.