Factors influencing the contamination rates of the conjunctival swabs and organ culture media of human donor eyes. Issue 38 (September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Röck, Tobias; Landenberger, Johanna; Buhl, Michael; Yoeruek, Efdal; Bartz-Schmidt, Karl Ulrich; Bramkamp, Matthias; Blumenstock, Gunnar; Röck, Daniel
• Other Names: Abdelrahman. Khaled Ahmed section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 97:Issue 38(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-09
• Subjects: bacteria -- conjunctival swab -- contamination -- cornea -- fungi -- microbiological testing; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011879
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: This study assessed the influence of donor, environmental, and logistical factors on the contamination rates of the conjunctival swabs and organ culture media of human donor eyes. In total, 1008 conjunctival swabs and 418 organ culture media samples from 504 consecutive human donor eyes were analyzed. Cross-tabulation, chi-squared tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess the influence of the different factors on the contamination rates of the conjunctival swabs and organ culture media. The overall contamination rates were 28.4% for the conjunctival swabs and 1.0% for the organ culture media. A prolonged time between death and the conjunctival swab collection was associated with an increased conjunctival swab contamination rate [odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–3.0, P = .007]. The highest conjunctival swab contamination rate was found in the corneas procured in external institutions (outside the university hospital) (44.1%, OR = 3.6, 95%CI = 1.5–8.4, P = .003). Hospitalization times of 2 to 7 days prior to death were associated with an increased conjunctival swab contamination risk (OR = 2.6, 95%CI = 1.1–5.8, P = .021). However, the sex, age, cause of donor death, differentiation between septic and aseptic donors, differentiation between heart-beating brain-dead multiorgan donors and cadaveric donors, a warmer mean monthly temperature, and death to corneoscleral disc excision time did not significantly increase the conjunctival swab contamination risk. In addition, none of these factors affected the organ culture media contamination risk. Moreover, a positive conjunctival swab did not significantly increase the media contamination risk ( P = .08). Surprisingly, the microorganisms causing media contamination were present at 50% of the amount detected on the conjunctival surface of the respective donor eye. A prolonged time between death and the conjunctival swab collection, a hospitalization time of 2 to 7 days prior to death, and corneal collection outside the university hospital seemed to be the main factors responsible for an increased conjunctival swab contamination risk. In addition, our investigation illustrated that a positive conjunctival swab is not a strong indicator for organ culture media contamination. Critical discussion is necessary regarding the validity of conjunctival swabs as prognostic parameters for organ culture media contamination.