Photoaggravated allergic contact dermatitis and transient photosensitivity caused by methylisothiazolinone. (12th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Aerts, Olivier; Goossens, An; Marguery, Marie‐Claude; Castelain, Michel; Boursault, Lucile; Giordano‐Labadie, Françoise; Lambert, Julien; Milpied, Brigitte
• Is Part Of: Contact dermatitis. Volume 78:Number 4(2018)
• Page Start: 241
• Page End: 245
• Publication Date: 2017-12-12
• Subjects: airborne allergic contact dermatitis -- cosmetics -- dilution series -- methylchloroisothiazolinone -- methylisothiazolinone -- occupational -- paints -- photoaggravation -- photosensitivity -- photo‐tests -- sunscreens; Contact dermatitis -- Periodicals; 616.51
• DOI: 10.1111/cod.12926
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0105-1873

Abstract

Summary: Background: Photoaggravated allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/methylisothiazolinone (MI) and MI has been reported. Objectives: To describe the clinical characteristics and results of (photo)patch tests and photo‐tests of 10 patients in Belgium and France suffering from photoaggravated contact dermatitis caused by MI. Patients and Methods: Five men and five women, with a median age of 49.5 years, were investigated between January 2012 and February 2017 because of suspected photoaggravated contact dermatitis. Patch tests, photopatch tests and/or photo‐tests were performed. Results: Seven patients had positive patch test reactions to both MCI/MI and MI, whereas 3 patients had positive patch test reactions only to MI. In most cases, MI was the (strong) primary sensitizer. Photopatch tests with MCI/MI and/or MI gave stronger reactions than patch tests with these derivatives, indicating photoaggravation. Sensitization probably took place from cosmetics and work‐related biocides, whereas elicitation of dermatitis was remarkably often related to airborne exposure to MI present in paints or industrial biocides. Four patients suffered from transient photosensitivity. Conclusion: Photoaggravated allergic contact dermatitis and transient photosensitivity caused by MI is a peculiar clinical presentation of allergic contact dermatitis caused by this preservative, and should be considered in daily clinical practice.