Impact Response Comparison Between Parametric Human Models and Postmortem Human Subjects with a Wide Range of Obesity Levels. Issue 10 (17th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Kai; Cao, Libo; Wang, Yulong; Hwang, Eunjoo; Reed, Matthew P.; Forman, Jason; Hu, Jingwen
• Is Part Of: Obesity. Volume 25:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 1786
• Page End: 1794
• Publication Date: 2017-08-17
• Subjects: Obesity -- Periodicals; 616.398005
• DOI: 10.1002/oby.21947
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1930-7381

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Field data analyses have shown that obesity significantly increases the occupant injury risks in motor vehicle crashes, but the injury assessment tools for people with obesity are largely lacking. The objectives of this study were to use a mesh morphing method to rapidly generate parametric finite element models with a wide range of obesity levels and to evaluate their biofidelity against impact tests using postmortem human subjects (PMHS). Methods: Frontal crash tests using three PMHS seated in a vehicle rear seat compartment with body mass index (BMI) from 24 to 40 kg/m 2 were selected. To develop the human models matching the PMHS geometry, statistical models of external body shape, rib cage, pelvis, and femur were applied to predict the target geometry using age, sex, stature, and BMI. A mesh morphing method based on radial basis functions was used to rapidly morph a baseline human model into the target geometry. The model‐predicted body excursions and injury measures were compared to the PMHS tests. Results: Comparisons of occupant kinematics and injury measures between the tests and simulations showed reasonable correlations across the wide range of BMI levels. Conclusions: The parametric human models have the capability to account for the obesity effects on the occupant impact responses and injury risks.