Prescription patterns of Chinese herbal products for patients with fractures in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based study. (15th September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liao, Hou-Hsun; Yeh, Chia-Chou; Lin, Che-Chen; Chen, Bor-Chyuan; Yeh, Ming-Hsien; Chang, Kuo-Ming; Sun, Mao-Feng; Yen, Hung-Rong
• Is Part Of: Journal of ethnopharmacology. Volume 173(2015)
• Page Start: 11
• Page End: 19
• Publication Date: 2015-09-15
• Subjects: Complementary and alternative medicine -- Fracture -- National health insurance research database -- Rhizoma Drynariae -- Shu-jing-huo-xue-tang -- Traditional Chinese medicine; Ethnopharmacology -- Periodicals; Pharmacognosy -- Periodicals; Herbs -- Periodicals; Herbs -- Periodicals; Pharmacognosy -- Periodicals; Pharmacognosie -- Périodiques; Herbes -- Périodiques; 615.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.07.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0378-8741

Abstract

Abstract: Ethnopharmacological relevance: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used in the treatment of fracture for thousands of years. However, large-scale surveys examing the utilization of Chinese herbal products (CHPs) for treating fractures and their related symptoms are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prescription patterns of CHPs among patients with fractures in Taiwan. Materials and methods: The TCM usage in patients with fractures was analyzed using a sample of one million individuals randomly selected from the National Health Insurance Research Database who were newly diagnosis with fractures in 2001-2008, with a followed-up period through 2010. Results: We identified 115, 327 patients who were newly diagnosed with fractures in the study population. Among them, 4.97% ( n =5731) adjunctively utilized TCM for fracture treatment. TCM users were mostly young or middle-aged, female, and resided in highly urbanized areas. With regard to the comorbidities of fractures, TCM users had a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive lung disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and stroke than non-TCM users, except for osteoporosis. Shu-jing-huo-xue-tang was the most frequently prescribed Chinese herbal formula, while Rhizoma Drynariae (Gu-sui-bu) was the most common single herb for patients with fractures. The CHPs were found to cover not only bone healing but also fracture-related symptoms. TCM users had lower medical expenditure for hospitalization for the first six months after incident fractures than non-TCM users (1749±2650 versus 2274±3159 US dollars, p <0.0001). Conclusions: Our study identified the TCM utilization for patients with fractures in Taiwan. Integration of TCM treatment reduced the medical costs for hospitalization. Further basic research and clinical studies to investigate the mechanism and clinical efficacies of CHPs are warranted. Graphical abstract: