Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign. (7th June 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign. (7th June 2017)
- Main Title:
- Natural history of Cesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the crossover sign
- Authors:
- Cali, G.
Forlani, F.
Timor‐Tritsch, I. E.
Palacios‐Jaraquemada, J.
Minneci, G.
D'Antonio, F. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Objective: Advances in prenatal imaging techniques have led to an increase in the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). However, antenatal counseling when CSP is diagnosed is challenging, and current evidence is derived mainly from small series reporting high rates of adverse maternal outcomes. The aim of this study was to ascertain the performance of prenatal ultrasound in predicting the natural history of CSP using a new sonographic sign, the crossover sign (COS). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of early first‐trimester (6–8 weeks' gestation) ultrasound images in women with morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) managed in the third trimester of pregnancy. The relationship between the gestational sac of the CSP, anterior uterine wall and Cesarean scar, defined as the COS, was analyzed to determine whether it could predict evolution in these cases. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between different types of COS (COS‐1, COS‐2+ or COS‐2–) and the occurrence of MAP. Results: Sixty‐eight pregnancies with MAP were included. The risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS‐1 than in those with COS‐2 (OR, 6.67 (95% CI, 1.3–33.3)). When evaluating the two variants of COS‐2 separately, the risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS‐1 vs COS‐2+ (OR, 5.83 (95% CI, 1.1–30.2)) and this risk was even higher when comparing casesABSTRACT: Objective: Advances in prenatal imaging techniques have led to an increase in the diagnosis of Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP). However, antenatal counseling when CSP is diagnosed is challenging, and current evidence is derived mainly from small series reporting high rates of adverse maternal outcomes. The aim of this study was to ascertain the performance of prenatal ultrasound in predicting the natural history of CSP using a new sonographic sign, the crossover sign (COS). Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of early first‐trimester (6–8 weeks' gestation) ultrasound images in women with morbidly adherent placenta (MAP) managed in the third trimester of pregnancy. The relationship between the gestational sac of the CSP, anterior uterine wall and Cesarean scar, defined as the COS, was analyzed to determine whether it could predict evolution in these cases. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between different types of COS (COS‐1, COS‐2+ or COS‐2–) and the occurrence of MAP. Results: Sixty‐eight pregnancies with MAP were included. The risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS‐1 than in those with COS‐2 (OR, 6.67 (95% CI, 1.3–33.3)). When evaluating the two variants of COS‐2 separately, the risk of placenta percreta was significantly higher in pregnancies with COS‐1 vs COS‐2+ (OR, 5.83 (95% CI, 1.1–30.2)) and this risk was even higher when comparing cases with COS‐1 vs COS‐2– (OR, 12.0 (95% CI, 1.9–75.7)). Logistic regression analysis showed that COS‐1 was associated independently with severe forms of MAP, such as placenta percreta and increta (OR, 12.85 (95% CI, 2.0–84.0)), while COS‐2+ was associated independently with placenta accreta (OR, 4.37 (95% CI, 1.1–17.0)). Conclusions: Ultrasound assessment of the relationship between the gestational sac of a CSP and the endometrial line (the COS) may help to determine whether a CSP will progress towards a less severe form of MAP, amenable to postnatal treatment, and successful pregnancy outcome. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings and elucidate the natural history of this condition. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Abstract : This article's abstract has been translated into Spanish and Chinese. Follow the links from theabstract to view the translations. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 50:Number 1(2017)
- Journal:
- Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 50:Number 1(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0050-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 100
- Page End:
- 104
- Publication Date:
- 2017-06-07
- Subjects:
- Cesarean scar pregnancy -- morbidly adherent placenta -- ultrasound
Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals
Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals
Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals
Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals
618.047543 - Journal URLs:
- http://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1469-0705/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/uog.16216 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-7692
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9082.815300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9056.xml