Outcomes of tumour related epilepsy in a specialised epilepsy surgery unit. (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, J.; Radjadurai, S.; Rahman, Z.; Hitos, K.; Ghattas, S.; Gomes, L.; Wong, C.; Bleasel, A.; Dexter, M.A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical neuroscience. Volume 59(2019)
• Page Start: 265
• Page End: 269
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Seizure -- Glioma -- Epilepsy -- Prognosis -- Extent of resection -- Engel classification; Brain -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Brain -- surgery -- Periodicals; Neurosurgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.01.062
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0967-5868

Abstract

Highlights: Seizures can be a significant issue for some patients with low grade gliomas. A review of outcomes in patients with low grade gliomas presenting with seizures. Some of these patients may benefit from management by a specialized epilepsy service. Abstract: Introduction: Seizures are an important cause of morbidity in patients with low grade gliomas with approximately 40% of cases drug resistant. The pathogenesis is quite complex and poorly understood. The treatment aims vary between almost purely epilepsy considerations and those that are primarily oncologic. Aim: To determine whether patients who present with seizures and are found to have a low grade glioma have better outcomes when managed through a specialized epilepsy unit compared to the general neurosurgical service. Methods: A review of the prospectively collected database was performed over a 10 year period to identify 48 adult patients who present with a seizure and were subsequently found to have a low grade glioma. These patients were analysed with respect to management through the specialized epilepsy service or the general neurosurgical service. The primary outcome was Engel classification between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included recurrence, postoperative deficits, delay to surgery, histology, grade and extent of resection. Outcomes: The patients managed through the epilepsy service had significantly higher rate of favourable Engel outcomes (I and II) compared to the general neurosurgery service (OR: 13.2, 95% CI: 1.239–140.679; P = 0.033). The epilepsy surgery group patients had a significantly higher delay to surgery (P < 0.001). The patients in the epilepsy service had a significantly higher resection ratio compared to the general neurosurgery service (73% vs 127%, P = 0.014). Rates of recurrence were not different between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with tumour related epilepsy who undergo an intensive presurgical evaluation may obtain better seizure related outcomes.