Temporal properties of material categorization and material rating: visual vs non-visual material features. (October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nagai, Takehiro; Matsushima, Toshiki; Koida, Kowa; Tani, Yusuke; Kitazaki, Michiteru; Nakauchi, Shigeki
• Is Part Of: Vision research. Volume 115(2015) Part B
• Page Start: 259
• Page End: 270
• Publication Date: 2015-10
• Subjects: Material perception -- Material category -- Surface feature -- Psychophysics; Vision -- Periodicals; 573.88
• DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0042-6989

Abstract

Highlights: Visual and non-visual feature ratings correlated with each other. Visual feature ratings correlated with rapid material discrimination. Non-visual feature ratings correlated with only slow material discrimination. Temporal properties for visual and non-visual feature perception may differ. Abstract: Humans can visually recognize material categories of objects, such as glass, stone, and plastic, easily. However, little is known about the kinds of surface quality features that contribute to such material class recognition. In this paper, we examine the relationship between perceptual surface features and material category discrimination performance for pictures of materials, focusing on temporal aspects, including reaction time and effects of stimulus duration. The stimuli were pictures of objects with an identical shape but made of different materials that could be categorized into seven classes (glass, plastic, metal, stone, wood, leather, and fabric). In a pre-experiment, observers rated the pictures on nine surface features, including visual (e.g., glossiness and transparency) and non-visual features (e.g., heaviness and warmness), on a 7-point scale. In the main experiments, observers judged whether two simultaneously presented pictures were classified as the same or different material category. Reaction times and effects of stimulus duration were measured. The results showed that visual feature ratings were correlated with material discrimination performance for short reaction times or short stimulus durations, while non-visual feature ratings were correlated only with performance for long reaction times or long stimulus durations. These results suggest that the mechanisms underlying visual and non-visual feature processing may differ in terms of processing time, although the cause is unclear. Visual surface features may mainly contribute to material recognition in daily life, while non-visual features may contribute only weakly, if at all.