Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado. (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado. (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Estimating the implied cost of carbon in future scenarios using a CGE model: The Case of Colorado
- Authors:
- Hannum, Christopher
Cutler, Harvey
Iverson, Terrence
Keyser, David - Abstract:
- Abstract: Using Colorado as a case study, we develop a state-level computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that reflects the roles of coal, natural gas, wind, solar, and hydroelectricity in supplying electricity. We focus on the economic impact of implementing Colorado's existing Renewable Portfolio Standard, updated in 2013. This requires that 25% of state generation come from qualifying renewable sources by 2020. We evaluate the policy under a variety of assumptions regarding wind integration costs and assumptions on the persistence of federal subsidies for wind. Specifically, we estimate the implied price of carbon as the carbon price at which a state-level policy would pass a state-level cost-benefit analysis, taking account of estimated greenhouse gas emission reductions and ancillary benefits from corresponding reductions in criteria pollutants. Our findings suggest that without the Production Tax Credit (federal aid), the state policy of mandating renewable power generation (RPS) is costly to state actors, with an implied cost of carbon of about $17 per ton of CO2 with a 3% discount rate. Federal aid makes the decision between natural gas and wind nearly cost neutral for Colorado. Highlights: If variability cost is low and renewables are federally subsidized, RPS is beneficial. With no PTC or high variability cost, drop in real consumption less than 0.1%. With PTC phaseout and high variability cost ICP is low, between $7.16 and $11.45. With no PTC and highAbstract: Using Colorado as a case study, we develop a state-level computable general equilibrium (CGE) model that reflects the roles of coal, natural gas, wind, solar, and hydroelectricity in supplying electricity. We focus on the economic impact of implementing Colorado's existing Renewable Portfolio Standard, updated in 2013. This requires that 25% of state generation come from qualifying renewable sources by 2020. We evaluate the policy under a variety of assumptions regarding wind integration costs and assumptions on the persistence of federal subsidies for wind. Specifically, we estimate the implied price of carbon as the carbon price at which a state-level policy would pass a state-level cost-benefit analysis, taking account of estimated greenhouse gas emission reductions and ancillary benefits from corresponding reductions in criteria pollutants. Our findings suggest that without the Production Tax Credit (federal aid), the state policy of mandating renewable power generation (RPS) is costly to state actors, with an implied cost of carbon of about $17 per ton of CO2 with a 3% discount rate. Federal aid makes the decision between natural gas and wind nearly cost neutral for Colorado. Highlights: If variability cost is low and renewables are federally subsidized, RPS is beneficial. With no PTC or high variability cost, drop in real consumption less than 0.1%. With PTC phaseout and high variability cost ICP is low, between $7.16 and $11.45. With no PTC and high variability cost ICP is between $12.66 and $17.34 per ton. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy policy. Volume 102(2017)
- Journal:
- Energy policy
- Issue:
- Volume 102(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 102, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 102
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0102-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 500
- Page End:
- 511
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Renewable Portfolio Standard -- Computable General Equilibrium
Energy policy -- Periodicals
Politique énergétique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014215 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.046 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9028.xml