Cavity characteristics, but not habitat, influence nest survival of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact in the subtropical Atlantic Forest. (April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cockle, Kristina L.; Bodrati, Alejandro; Lammertink, Martjan; Martin, Kathy
• Is Part Of: Biological conservation. Volume 184(2015)
• Page Start: 193
• Page End: 200
• Publication Date: 2015-04
• Subjects: Argentina -- Habitat degradation -- Hole-nesting bird -- Logging -- Nest success -- Nest-site characteristics; Conservation of natural resources -- Periodicals; Nature conservation -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Environmental Pollution -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.026
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3207

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: How valuable are tree cavities in anthropogenic habitat for cavity-nesting birds? Nest survival was related to tree and cavity features, not human impact to habitat. Nests survived better in high cavities with small entrances, and in living trees. Cavities in logged forest and farms have high conservation value, but few remain. Policies to retain large old trees should replace minimum diameter cutting limits. Abstract: Cavity-nesting vertebrates are an important component of biodiversity in tropical and subtropical forests, but their persistence will increasingly depend on remnant trees in logged forest and agricultural areas. To identify key habitat features for conservation, we examined the factors that influenced daily nest survival for a community of cavity-nesting birds along a gradient of human impact, from primary Atlantic Forest through logged forest to farms. We used logistic-exposure models to determine how characteristics of the habitat, nest tree, cavity, and timing influenced daily nest survival. Overall, predation and/or usurpation caused 92% of nest failures. Daily survival rates ranged 0.961–0.992 for five species of birds that could be studied best, giving probabilities of 0.19–0.62 of survival from laying to fledging. The top models predicting nest survival included cavity and tree characteristics but no habitat variables (canopy cover, forest condition, or distance to forest edge). Small birds (12–128 g) experienced higher nest survival in cavities with smaller entrance diameters, higher above the ground. Large birds (141–400 g) experienced higher nest survival in living trees than in dead trees. Birds experienced similar nest survival in primary forest, logged forest, and farms. Our results highlight the conservation value of cavity-bearing trees in anthropogenic habitats. A pressing policy issue for tropical and subtropical forests is to move beyond minimum diameter cutting limits and instead focus on retention of large old trees.