Biosimilar switching and related medical liability. (April 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Biosimilar switching and related medical liability. (April 2018)
- Main Title:
- Biosimilar switching and related medical liability
- Authors:
- Rocco, Paolo
Selletti, Sonia
Minghetti, Paola - Abstract:
- Abstract: Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the reference biological medicinal product. Therefore, if a patient experiences an adverse event, or a loss of efficacy, when transitioned to a biosimilar, the distribution of medical liability will be different from the case of both the originator and generics. Moreover, the case of naïve patients is different from that of non-naïve patients. In the case of naïve patients, physicians make their choice from a range of medicinal products that pose the same risk, since it is not possible to know with any certainty the patients' response to each therapeutic option until they have taken the drug. If physicians, instead, switch to a biosimilar for a patient already in treatment with the originator, they are switching from an option where the individual response is known, to an option where it is unknown. Given the evolving framework of biosimilar legislation, sharing choices with patients and obtaining their informed consent when switching to a biosimilar could represent an effective approach on the part of the prescribing physician. Moreover, a supranational database containing real-life data about patients in treatment with biological medicines, including information on the actual biological medicinal products administered, could complement the data obtained from clinical studies. Graphical abstract: Highlights: Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the originator. ChainAbstract: Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the reference biological medicinal product. Therefore, if a patient experiences an adverse event, or a loss of efficacy, when transitioned to a biosimilar, the distribution of medical liability will be different from the case of both the originator and generics. Moreover, the case of naïve patients is different from that of non-naïve patients. In the case of naïve patients, physicians make their choice from a range of medicinal products that pose the same risk, since it is not possible to know with any certainty the patients' response to each therapeutic option until they have taken the drug. If physicians, instead, switch to a biosimilar for a patient already in treatment with the originator, they are switching from an option where the individual response is known, to an option where it is unknown. Given the evolving framework of biosimilar legislation, sharing choices with patients and obtaining their informed consent when switching to a biosimilar could represent an effective approach on the part of the prescribing physician. Moreover, a supranational database containing real-life data about patients in treatment with biological medicines, including information on the actual biological medicinal products administered, could complement the data obtained from clinical studies. Graphical abstract: Highlights: Unlike generics, biosimilars are similar, but not equivalent, to the originator. Chain liability for a biosimilar differs from that of the originator and generics. Clinical studies on interchangeability of biosimilars are not conclusive. In biosimilar switching, sharing choices with patients seems a sensible approach. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of forensic and legal medicine. Volume 55(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of forensic and legal medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 55(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 55, Issue 2018 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 55
- Issue:
- 2018
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0055-2018-0000
- Page Start:
- 93
- Page End:
- 94
- Publication Date:
- 2018-04
- Subjects:
- Biosimilars -- Interchangeability -- Substitution -- Non-naïve patients -- Informed consent -- Medical liability
Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals
Forensic sciences -- Periodicals
Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine légale -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
614.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-forensic-and-legal-medicine/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/1752928X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.018 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1752-928X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4984.586300
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 9019.xml