Thermoremanence acquisition and demagnetization for titanomagnetite under lithospheric pressures. Issue 10 (29th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Launay, Nicolas; Rochette, Pierre; Quesnel, Yoann; Demory, François; Bezaeva, Natalia S.; Lattard, Dominique
• Is Part Of: Geophysical research letters. Volume 44:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: 4839
• Page End: 4845
• Publication Date: 2017-05-29
• Subjects: TRM -- Pressure -- Titanomagnetite -- lithosphere -- Magnetic anomalies; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Periodicals; Lunar geology -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073279
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8276

Abstract

Abstract: The geological sources of large‐scale lithospheric magnetic field anomalies are poorly constrained. Understanding the magnetic behavior of rocks and minerals under the pressures and temperatures encountered at large crustal depths is particularly important in that task. The impact of lithospheric pressure is not well known and most of the time neglected in numerical models of the geological sources of magnetic anomalies. We present thermal remanent magnetization (TRM) acquisition and stepwise thermal demagnetization on synthetic titanomagnetite dispersed powder, within an amagnetic cell under hydrostatic pressure up to 1 GPa. TRM is measured after thermal cycling within a cryogenic magnetometer. Pressure‐dependent increase in the Curie temperature (initially in the 50–70°C range) is observed, mostly between 0.3 and 0.6 GPa, on the order of 20 K/GPa. TRM intensity also increases with pressure up to 200% at 675 MPa, although the pressure variation with temperature inside the cell complicates the interpretation. Key Points: Titanomagnetite unblocking temperature increases with pressure at a rate of 10–20 K/GPa Thermoremanent magnetization acquired under pressure higher than 400–600 MPa is twice as strong as TRM acquired at atmospheric pressure Results suggest that the magnetized part of the lithosphere is thicker than currently considered and that 50 to 60% of its magnetization may be underestimated