"There are mentalities that need changing": Constructing personhood, formulating citizenship, and performing subjectivities on a settler colonial frontier. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gombay, Nicole
• Is Part Of: Political geography. Volume 48(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 11
• Page End: 23
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: Identity -- Indigenous peoples -- Legal pluralism -- Governmentality -- Resource management -- Property; Political geography -- Periodicals; Géographie politique -- Périodiques; 320.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.05.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-6298

Abstract

Abstract: Settler colonial nations are sites of legal pluralism in which encounters between differing constructions of citizenship are formulated. These can involve customary, differentiated, and universal modes of citizenship. But the relationships amongst these are problematic, as are the ways they play out in the performance of subjectivities. To understand these dynamics, we need to think about ideas of personhood that are at their root. Based on research in Nunavik, this article focuses on how, through wildlife management, notions of personhood are being legally codified, particularly in relation to property. It examines the degree to which official ideas of personhood coincide with Indigenous ones in the construction of citizenship, and considers how these combine with property relations in the performance of subjectivities. Enforcing state wildlife regulations has altered the moral codes that define what persons are and determine how they should interact with one another. This research underscores the contradictions that arise as a result of codifying notions of personhood and citizenship in the context of settler colonialism.