Disorders of representation and control in semantic cognition: Effects of familiarity, typicality, and specificity. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rogers, Timothy T.; Patterson, Karalyn; Jefferies, Elizabeth; Lambon Ralph, Matthew A.
• Is Part Of: Neuropsychologia. Volume 76(2015)
• Page Start: 220
• Page End: 239
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Neuropsychologie -- Périodiques; Neuropsychology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3932

Abstract

Abstract: We present a case-series comparison of patients with cross-modal semantic impairments consequent on either (a) bilateral anterior temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia (SD) or (b) left-hemisphere fronto-parietal and/or posterior temporal stroke in semantic aphasia (SA). Both groups were assessed on a new test battery designed to measure how performance is influenced by concept familiarity, typicality and specificity. In line with previous findings, performance in SD was strongly modulated by all of these factors, with better performance for more familiar items (regardless of typicality), for more typical items (regardless of familiarity) and for tasks that did not require very specific classification, consistent with the gradual degradation of conceptual knowledge in SD. The SA group showed significant impairments on all tasks but their sensitivity to familiarity, typicality and specificity was more variable and governed by task-specific effects of these factors on controlled semantic processing. The results are discussed with reference to theories about the complementary roles of representation and manipulation of semantic knowledge. Highlights: Case-series comparison of semantic dementia (SD) and semantic aphasia (SA). Effects of concept familiarity, typicality and specificity across four tasks. SD performance was better for familiar/typical items and less specific classification. In SA, effects of these factors varied across tasks reflecting the control demands. Data are consistent with interacting semantic representations and control processes.