Importance of including cultural practices in ecological restoration. Issue 5 (6th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wehi, Priscilla M.; Lord, Janice M.
• Is Part Of: Conservation biology. Volume 31:Issue 5(2017:Oct.)
• Page Start: 1109
• Page End: 1118
• Publication Date: 2017-06-06
• Subjects: biocultural restoration -- politics and policy -- threatened species -- traditional ecological knowledge -- urban ecology -- conocimiento ecológico tradicional -- ecología urbana -- especies amenazadas -- política y póliza -- restauración biocultural; Conservation biology -- Periodicals; 333.9516
• DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12915
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0888-8892

Abstract

Abstract: Ecosystems worldwide have a long history of use and management by indigenous cultures. However, environmental degradation can reduce the availability of culturally important resources. Ecological restoration aims to repair damage to ecosystems caused by human activity, but it is unclear how often restoration projects incorporate the return of harvesting or traditional life patterns for indigenous communities. We examined the incorporation of cultural use of natural resources into ecological restoration in the context of a culturally important but protected New Zealand bird; among award‐winning restoration projects in Australasia and worldwide; and in the peer‐reviewed restoration ecology literature. Among New Zealand's culturally important bird species, differences in threat status and availability for hunting were large. These differences indicate the values of a colonizing culture can inhibit harvesting by indigenous people. In Australasia among award‐winning ecological restoration projects, <17% involved human use of restored areas beyond aesthetic or recreational use, despite many projects encouraging community participation. Globally, restoration goals differed among regions. For example, in North America, projects were primarily conservation oriented, whereas in Asia and Africa projects frequently focused on restoring cultural harvesting. From 1995 to 2014, the restoration ecology literature contained few references to cultural values or use. We argue that restoration practitioners are missing a vital component for reassembling functional ecosystems. Inclusion of sustainably harvestable areas within restored landscapes may allow for the continuation of traditional practices that shaped ecosystems for millennia, and also aid project success by ensuring community support.