Aerosol lidar observations of atmospheric mixing in Los Angeles: Climatology and implications for greenhouse gas observations. Issue 16 (23rd August 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ware, John; Kort, Eric A.; DeCola, Phil; Duren, Riley
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 16(2016)
• Page Start: 9862
• Page End: 9878
• Publication Date: 2016-08-23
• Subjects: urban greenhouse gases -- lidar -- mixed layer -- PBL height; Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2016JD024953
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: Atmospheric observations of greenhouse gases provide essential information on sources and sinks of these key atmospheric constituents. To quantify fluxes from atmospheric observations, representation of transport—especially vertical mixing—is a necessity and often a source of error. We report on remotely sensed profiles of vertical aerosol distribution taken over a 2 year period in Pasadena, California. Using an automated analysis system, we estimate daytime mixing layer depth, achieving high confidence in the afternoon maximum on 51% of days with profiles from a Sigma Space Mini Micropulse LiDAR (MiniMPL) and on 36% of days with a Vaisala CL51 ceilometer. We note that considering ceilometer data on a logarithmic scale, a standard method, introduces, an offset in mixing height retrievals. The mean afternoon maximum mixing height is 770 m Above Ground Level in summer and 670 m in winter, with significant day‐to‐day variance (within season σ = 220m≈30%). Taking advantage of the MiniMPL's portability, we demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the detailed horizontal structure of the mixing layer by automobile. We compare our observations to planetary boundary layer (PBL) heights from sonde launches, North American regional reanalysis (NARR), and a custom Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model developed for greenhouse gas (GHG) monitoring in Los Angeles. NARR and WRF PBL heights at Pasadena are both systematically higher than measured, NARR by 2.5 times; these biases will cause proportional errors in GHG flux estimates using modeled transport. We discuss how sustained lidar observations can be used to reduce flux inversion error by selecting suitable analysis periods, calibrating models, or characterizing bias for correction in post processing. Key Points: Aerosol lidar maps LA mixing depth in space (pilot mobile study) and time (2 years data) Automatic mixing depth retrieval system finds daily variability far exceeds seasonal difference PBL heights in models used for GHG monitoring show biases that will carry over to flux estimates