Implementation of a second victim program in the neonatal intensive care unit: An interim analysis of employee satisfaction. Issue 6 (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Implementation of a second victim program in the neonatal intensive care unit: An interim analysis of employee satisfaction. Issue 6 (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Implementation of a second victim program in the neonatal intensive care unit: An interim analysis of employee satisfaction
- Authors:
- Merandi, Jenna
Winning, Adrien M
Liao, Nancy
Rogers, Erin
Lewe, Dorcas
Gerhardt, Cynthia A - Abstract:
- Background: While research has established the negative impact of medical errors or adverse events on healthcare providers, few organizations have evaluated support programs for second victims. Thus, we examined satisfaction with a peer support program to provide lessons learned from early implementation. Methods: Participants ( N = 466) were recruited from seven neonatal intensive care units affiliated with a large, pediatric hospital. Following implementation of a peer support program, a mixed-method online survey assessed program satisfaction at 12 month follow-up ( n = 250, 54%). Results: Most participants were female ( n = 243, 97%), white ( n = 239, 96%), and nurses ( n = 180, 72%), with an average age of 40.80 (SD = 11.89) years. Ninety-three (37%) participants observed or were directly involved in an error or adverse event during the preceding six months. Thirty-six (14%) received support from someone within the neonatal intensive care unit, and 16 (16%) had spoken with a peer supporter after the event. All users reported benefit from the interaction. However, most participants were unaware of the program or had not utilized it. Conclusion: Findings suggested that peer support programs are likely to be viewed favorably by second victims. Healthcare providers who accessed the program felt it was a valuable resource and helped them return to work effectively after an error or adverse event. Better communication is needed during early implementation of any peerBackground: While research has established the negative impact of medical errors or adverse events on healthcare providers, few organizations have evaluated support programs for second victims. Thus, we examined satisfaction with a peer support program to provide lessons learned from early implementation. Methods: Participants ( N = 466) were recruited from seven neonatal intensive care units affiliated with a large, pediatric hospital. Following implementation of a peer support program, a mixed-method online survey assessed program satisfaction at 12 month follow-up ( n = 250, 54%). Results: Most participants were female ( n = 243, 97%), white ( n = 239, 96%), and nurses ( n = 180, 72%), with an average age of 40.80 (SD = 11.89) years. Ninety-three (37%) participants observed or were directly involved in an error or adverse event during the preceding six months. Thirty-six (14%) received support from someone within the neonatal intensive care unit, and 16 (16%) had spoken with a peer supporter after the event. All users reported benefit from the interaction. However, most participants were unaware of the program or had not utilized it. Conclusion: Findings suggested that peer support programs are likely to be viewed favorably by second victims. Healthcare providers who accessed the program felt it was a valuable resource and helped them return to work effectively after an error or adverse event. Better communication is needed during early implementation of any peer support program to increase awareness and use of this resource among healthcare providers. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of patient safety and risk management. Volume 23:Issue 6(2018)
- Journal:
- Journal of patient safety and risk management
- Issue:
- Volume 23:Issue 6(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 23, Issue 6 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0023-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 231
- Page End:
- 238
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Second victim -- peer support -- care for caregiver
Medical jurisprudence -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Medical personnel -- Malpractice -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
Risk management -- Great Britain -- Periodicals - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/cri ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/2516043518809457 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2516-0435
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8935.xml