Revising Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for the bipolar disorders: Phase I of the AREDOC project. (December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Revising Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for the bipolar disorders: Phase I of the AREDOC project. (December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Revising Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for the bipolar disorders: Phase I of the AREDOC project
- Authors:
- Parker, Gordon
Tavella, Gabriela
Macqueen, Glenda
Berk, Michael
Grunze, Heinz
Deckersbach, Thilo
Dunner, David L
Sajatovic, Martha
Amsterdam, Jay D
Ketter, Terence A
Yatham, Lakshmi N
Kessing, Lars Vedel
Bassett, Darryl
Zimmerman, Mark
Fountoulakis, Kostas N
Duffy, Anne
Alda, Martin
Calkin, Cynthia
Sharma, Verinder
Anand, Amit
Singh, Manpreet K
Hajek, Tomas
Boyce, Philip
Frey, Benicio N
Castle, David J
Young, Allan H
Vieta, Eduard
Rybakowski, Janusz K
Swartz, Holly A
Schaffer, Ayal
Murray, Greg
Bayes, Adam
Lam, Raymond W
Bora, Emre
Post, Robert M
Ostacher, Michael J
Lafer, Beny
Cleare, Anthony J
Burdick, Katherine E
O'Donovan, Claire
Ortiz, Abigail
Henry, Chantal
Kanba, Shigenobu
Rosenblat, Joshua D
Parikh, Sagar V
Bond, David J
Grunebaum, Michael F
Frangou, Sophia
Goldberg, Joseph F
Orum, Margo
Osser, David N
Frye, Mark A
McIntyre, Roger S
Fagiolini, Andrea
Manicavasagar, Vijaya
Carlson, Gabrielle A
Malhi, Gin S
… (more) - Abstract:
- Objective: To derive new criteria sets for defining manic and hypomanic episodes (and thus for defining the bipolar I and II disorders), an international Task Force was assembled and termed AREDOC reflecting its role of Assessment, Revision and Evaluation of DSM and other Operational Criteria. This paper reports on the first phase of its deliberations and interim criteria recommendations. Method: The first stage of the process consisted of reviewing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and recent International Classification of Diseases criteria, identifying their limitations and generating modified criteria sets for further in-depth consideration. Task Force members responded to recommendations for modifying criteria and from these the most problematic issues were identified. Results: Principal issues focussed on by Task Force members were how best to differentiate mania and hypomania, how to judge 'impairment' (both in and of itself and allowing that functioning may sometimes improve during hypomanic episodes) and concern that rejecting some criteria (e.g. an imposed duration period) might risk false-positive diagnoses of the bipolar disorders. Conclusion: This first-stage report summarises the clinical opinions of international experts in the diagnosis and management of the bipolar disorders, allowing readers to contemplate diagnostic parameters that may influence their clinical decisions. The findings meaningfully inform subsequent TaskObjective: To derive new criteria sets for defining manic and hypomanic episodes (and thus for defining the bipolar I and II disorders), an international Task Force was assembled and termed AREDOC reflecting its role of Assessment, Revision and Evaluation of DSM and other Operational Criteria. This paper reports on the first phase of its deliberations and interim criteria recommendations. Method: The first stage of the process consisted of reviewing Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, and recent International Classification of Diseases criteria, identifying their limitations and generating modified criteria sets for further in-depth consideration. Task Force members responded to recommendations for modifying criteria and from these the most problematic issues were identified. Results: Principal issues focussed on by Task Force members were how best to differentiate mania and hypomania, how to judge 'impairment' (both in and of itself and allowing that functioning may sometimes improve during hypomanic episodes) and concern that rejecting some criteria (e.g. an imposed duration period) might risk false-positive diagnoses of the bipolar disorders. Conclusion: This first-stage report summarises the clinical opinions of international experts in the diagnosis and management of the bipolar disorders, allowing readers to contemplate diagnostic parameters that may influence their clinical decisions. The findings meaningfully inform subsequent Task Force stages (involving a further commentary stage followed by an empirical study) that are expected to generate improved symptom criteria for diagnosing the bipolar I and II disorders with greater precision and to clarify whether they differ dimensionally or categorically. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. Volume 52:Number 12(2018)
- Journal:
- Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry
- Issue:
- Volume 52:Number 12(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 52, Issue 12 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0052-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1173
- Page End:
- 1182
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12
- Subjects:
- Bipolar disorder -- diagnosis -- mania -- hypomania -- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -- Fifth Edition
Psychiatry -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- Australia -- Periodicals
Psychiatry -- New Zealand -- Periodicals
616.89005 - Journal URLs:
- http://anp.sagepub.com ↗
http://informahealthcare.com/journal/anp ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=anp ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0004867418808382 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0004-8674
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1796.893000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8936.xml