'The onus is on me': primary care patient views of Medicare‐funded team care in chronic disease management in Australia. (22nd March 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Foster, Michele M.; Mitchell, Geoffrey K.
• Is Part Of: Health expectations. Volume 18:Number 5(2015)
• Page Start: 879
• Page End: 891
• Publication Date: 2013-03-22
• Subjects: allied health services -- Australia -- chronic disease management -- patient experience -- primary care -- team care; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.12061
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6513

Abstract

Abstract: Background and objective: This study investigated the views of primary care patients in receipt of Medicare‐funded team care for chronic disease management (CDM) in Australia. Design: A qualitative study using a repeat in‐depth interview design. Participants and setting: Twenty‐three patients (17 female), aged 32–89, were recruited over a six‐month period from two purposively selected general practices: one urban and one regional practice in Queensland, Australia. Data collection procedure: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with participants 6 months apart. An interview guide was used to ensure consistency of topics explored. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was conducted. Results: Patients in this study viewed the combined contributions of a GP and other health professionals in team care as thorough and reassuring. In this case of Medicare‐funded team care, patients also saw obligations within the structured care routine which cultivated a personal ethics of CDM. This was further influenced by how patients viewed their role in the health‐care relationship. Aside from personal obligations, Medicare funding got patients engaged in team care by providing financial incentives. Indeed, this was a defining factor in seeing allied health professionals. However, team care was also preferential due to patients' valuations of costs and benefits. Conclusion: Patients are likely to engage with a structured team care approach to CDM if there is a sense of personal obligation and sufficient financial incentive. The level of engagement in team care is likely to be optimized if patient expectations and preferences are considered in decisions.