A century of talks on research: what happened to development and production?. (1st January 2012)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Godin, Benoit; Lane, Joseph P.
• Is Part Of: International journal of transitions and innovation systems. Volume 2:Number 1(2012)
• Page Start: 5
• Page End: 13
• Publication Date: 2012-01-01
• Subjects: research and development -- R&D -- innovation -- innovation policy -- statistics -- intellectual history; Technological innovations -- Economic aspects -- Former Soviet republics -- Periodicals; Technological innovations -- Economic aspects -- Europe, Eastern -- Periodicals; Technological innovations -- Economic aspects -- Europe, Central -- Periodicals; Technological innovations -- Economic aspects -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 338.064094705
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-0071

Abstract

For decades, research and development or R&D has dominated innovation policies. This paper considers the statistical categories supporting this representation. It argues that the acronym 'R&D' has weakened critical thinking and policies about innovation in Western nations. The categories 'research' and 'development' used to characterise innovation arose not to explain the underlying methods or mechanisms of innovation, but instead to satisfy the requirements of statistical analyses. The D became subsumed under the R in the acronym R&D and, at the same time and because of the subsuming precisely, it disappeared from view. Further, the supremacy of research in representations and public policies eliminated the consideration of a third critical element in achieving innovation: P for industrial production. The authors suggest a new category (RD&P) to remedy the deficiencies of present analyses.