'Would women leaders have prevented the global financial crisis?' Teaching critical thinking by questioning a question. (1st January 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nelson, Julie A.
• Is Part Of: International journal of pluralism and economics education. Volume 4:Number 2(2013)
• Page Start: 192
• Page End: 209
• Publication Date: 2013-01-01
• Subjects: feminist economics -- financial crisis -- risk aversion -- risk -- economics education -- behavioural economics -- stereotyping -- gender -- sex -- finance -- markets; Economics -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals; Pluralism -- Periodicals; 330.071
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-5648

Abstract

'Would having more women in leadership have prevented the financial crisis?' This question, raised in the popular media, can make effective fodder for teaching critical thinking within courses such as gender and economics, money and financial institutions, pluralist economics, or behavioural economics. While the question, as posed, demands an answer of 'Yes – sex differences in traits are important' or 'No – gender is irrelevant', students can be encouraged to question the question itself. The first part of this essay briefly reviews literature on the sameness-versus-difference debate, noting that the belief in exaggerated behavioural differences between men and women is not, in fact, empirically supported. But neither is gender irrelevant. The second part of this essay examines the important role of gender biases in the social construction of markets, and especially financial markets. Specific examples and tools that can be used when teaching about difference, similarity, and markets are discussed throughout.