Evaluating Transit Priority Signal Phasing at Most Multimodal Intersection in Portland, Oregon. Issue 1 (2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marnell, Patrick; Zebell, Paul; Koonce, Peter; Quayle, Shaun
• Is Part Of: Transportation research record. Volume 2619:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 44
• Page End: 54
• Publication Date: 2017
• Subjects: Transportation -- Periodicals; Roads; Transport -- Périodiques; Routes -- Périodiques; Routes -- Conception et construction -- Périodiques; Roads; Transportation; 388.05
• DOI: 10.3141/2619-05
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-1981

Abstract

This research documents the operational benefits of additional phases, barrier bars, and a call-based transit priority signal-phasing strategy over a more traditional eight-phase, two-barrier preemption-based transit signal–phasing strategy. The call-based timing strategy, with a more flexible ring-and-barrier structure, takes advantage of additional phases to run less-impactful transit prioritization for light-rail trains. These two strategies have been field implemented in Portland, Oregon, at the signalized intersection of Southwest Porter Street and Southwest Moody Avenue, an intersection that has distinct signalized movements for the private-automobile, streetcar, light-rail train, bus, pedestrian, and bicycle modes. The operations of the two-intersection signal-phasing strategies were evaluated and tested by using hardware and software-in-the-loop microsimulation (in Vissim) to isolate the expected change in operational efficiency in modal delay. The two-barrier preemption-based transit signal-phasing strategy showed high variability in delay for certain movements, in particular, pedestrians. The call-based phasing strategy with flexible ring-and-barrier structure reduced total and average intersection delay. This research shows that the call-based phasing strategy with flexible ring-and-barrier structure can provide a less disruptive transit prioritization. Agencies should consider the call-phased transit priority strategy over the more traditional preemption-based strategy at a signalized intersection when ( a ) delaying potential preemptive movements mode will not have large safety effects, ( b ) pedestrian demand is high, ( c ) preemption service will be frequent, or ( d ) the intersection is operating at or over capacity.