Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 1 (January 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 1 (January 2018)
- Main Title:
- Foley Plus Oxytocin Compared With Oxytocin for Induction After Membrane Rupture
- Authors:
- Mackeen, A. Dhanya
Durie, Danielle E.
Lin, Monique
Huls, Christopher K.
Qureshey, Emma
Paglia, Michael J.
Sun, Haiyan
Sciscione, Anthony - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin infusion compared with oxytocin infusion alone for labor induction and cervical ripening in women 34 weeks of gestation or greater with prelabor rupture of membranes. METHODS: This is a randomized, multicenter trial of women with a live, singleton gestation at 34 weeks of gestation or greater with prelabor rupture of membranes, an unfavorable cervical examination (less than 2 cm or 80% effaced), and no contraindication to labor. Participants were randomly allocated to a transcervical Foley catheter inflated to 30 cc with concurrent oxytocin infusion or oxytocin infusion alone. Oxytocin administration was standardized across sites. The primary study outcome was interval from induction to delivery. To detect a 2.5-hour difference in the interval from induction to delivery, we required outcome data on 194 women, assuming 80% power and a two-tailed α of 5%. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: We enrolled 201 women: 93 were allocated to Foley and 108 to oxytocin. Demographics were similar between the groups. Time to delivery was not significantly different between groups: in the Foley group, it was 13.9 hours (±6.9 SD) compared with 14.4 hours (±7.9 SD) in the oxytocin group ( P =.69). There were more cases of clinical chorioamnionitis (8% compared with 0%, P <.01) in the Foley group compared with the oxytocin group. There were no differences for other infectious morbidities or anyAbstract : OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin infusion compared with oxytocin infusion alone for labor induction and cervical ripening in women 34 weeks of gestation or greater with prelabor rupture of membranes. METHODS: This is a randomized, multicenter trial of women with a live, singleton gestation at 34 weeks of gestation or greater with prelabor rupture of membranes, an unfavorable cervical examination (less than 2 cm or 80% effaced), and no contraindication to labor. Participants were randomly allocated to a transcervical Foley catheter inflated to 30 cc with concurrent oxytocin infusion or oxytocin infusion alone. Oxytocin administration was standardized across sites. The primary study outcome was interval from induction to delivery. To detect a 2.5-hour difference in the interval from induction to delivery, we required outcome data on 194 women, assuming 80% power and a two-tailed α of 5%. Analysis was by intent to treat. RESULTS: We enrolled 201 women: 93 were allocated to Foley and 108 to oxytocin. Demographics were similar between the groups. Time to delivery was not significantly different between groups: in the Foley group, it was 13.9 hours (±6.9 SD) compared with 14.4 hours (±7.9 SD) in the oxytocin group ( P =.69). There were more cases of clinical chorioamnionitis (8% compared with 0%, P <.01) in the Foley group compared with the oxytocin group. There were no differences for other infectious morbidities or any other variable studied. CONCLUSION: In patients with prelabor rupture of membranes, the use of a transcervical Foley catheter in addition to oxytocin does not shorten the time to delivery compared with oxytocin alone, but may increase the incidence of intraamniotic infection. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01973036. Abstract : The use of a transcervical Foley catheter does not shorten the time to delivery for women with an unfavorable cervix undergoing oxytocin labor induction after membrane rupture. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 131:Issue 1(2018)
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 131:Issue 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0131-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2018-01
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002374 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8819.xml