Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest. (15th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Takata, Kumiko; Patra, Prabir K; Kotani, Ayumi; Mori, Junko; Belikov, Dmitry; Ichii, Kazuhito; Saeki, Tazu; Ohta, Takeshi; Saito, Kazuyuki; Ueyama, Masahito; Ito, Akihiko; Maksyutov, Shamil; Miyazaki, Shin; Burke, Eleanor J; Ganshin, Alexander; Iijima, Yoshihiro; Ise, Takeshi; Machiya, Hirokazu; Maximov, Trofim C; Niwa, Yosuke; O'ishi, Ryo'ta; Park, Hotaek; Sasai, Takahiro; Sato, Hisashi; Tei, Shunsuke; Zhuravlev, Ruslan; Machida, Toshinobu; Sugimoto, Atsuko; Aoki, Shuji
• Is Part Of: Environmental research letters. Volume 12:Number 12(2017:Dec.)
• Publication Date: 2017-12-15
• Subjects: net CO2 flux -- multi method comparison -- Siberian larch forest -- seasonal cycle -- interannual variation; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Human ecology -- Research -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-9326

Abstract

Abstract: Carbon dioxide (CO2 ) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004–2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004–2007 were 10.9 g C m −2 month −1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m −2 month −1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m −2 month −1 and 0.863 g C m −2 month −1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m −2 month −1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June–August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m −2 month −1 ) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m −2 month −1 ). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m −2 month −1 and 34.2 g C m −2 month −1 ) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m −2 month −1 ) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m −2 month −1 and 1.45 g C m −2 month −1 ). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.