An Exploratory Study of a Nurse-Led HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis Program. (February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Byrne, Patrick; Jacob, Jean Daniel; Orser, Lauren
• Is Part Of: Policy, politics and nursing practice. Volume 19:Number 1/2(2018)
• Page Start: 29
• Page End: 39
• Publication Date: 2018-02
• Subjects: confession -- HIV -- nursing -- postexposure prophylaxis -- qualitative; Nursing -- Practice -- Periodicals; Nursing -- Standards -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Health Policy -- Periodicals; Nursing -- Periodicals; Politics -- Periodicals; Public Policy -- Periodicals; 610.73
• DOI: 10.1177/1527154418784237
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1527-1544

Abstract

The provision of HIV medications to HIV-negative persons after exposure to HIV is known as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP). Because this prevention strategy is primarily only available in emergency rooms, we piloted a nurse-led community-based PEP program in Ottawa from September 2013 through August 2015. As part of evaluating this program, we conducted qualitative interviews with persons who initiated PEP. Twelve men who had engaged in condomless anal sex with other males participated. Thematic analysis of the interview transcripts highlighted that PEP was considered unmentionable because the participants' saw it as proof of past behavior that was perceived negatively. Our results thus revealed that PEP was stigmatized, which made our participants reluctant to answer health care professionals' "questions" about why they needed PEP. To do so was to be exposed to stigma. The use of PEP for our participants was a balance between wanting to minimize the risks of HIV acquisition against the risks of disclosing the unmentionable. We take these findings to mean that clinicians and health service policy workers should move PEP into community clinics (decentralizing it from hospitals, and increase the involvement of nurses); aim to provide all required PEP services in community settings (consolidate PEP provision in these clinics); and ensure PEP services are streamlined to remove extraneous data collection (meaning history and exam tools should be standardized to minimize needless questions that may impede PEP access). Together, these recommendations may increase patients' access to PEP, and maximize its HIV prevention effects.