Piston geometry effects in a light-duty, swirl-supported diesel engine: Flow structure characterization. (December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Perini, Federico; Zha, Kan; Busch, Stephen; Kurtz, Eric; Peterson, Richard C; Warey, Alok; Reitz, Rolf D
• Is Part Of: International journal of engine research. Volume 19:Number 10(2018)
• Page Start: 1079
• Page End: 1098
• Publication Date: 2018-12
• Subjects: Swirl -- in-cylinder flows -- stepped-lip bowl -- piston geometry -- diesel engine; Engines -- Periodicals; 629.25
• DOI: 10.1177/1468087417742572
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-0874

Abstract

This work studied how in-cylinder flow structure is affected in a light-duty, swirl-supported diesel engine when equipped with three different piston geometries: the first two featuring a conventional re-entrant bowl, either with or without valve cut-outs on the piston surface and the third featuring a stepped-lip bowl. Particle image velocimetry experiments were conducted inside an optical engine to measure swirl vortex intensity and structure during the intake and compression strokes. A full computational model of the optical diesel engine was built using the FRESCO code, a recently developed object-oriented parallel computational fluid dynamics platform for engine simulations. The model was first validated against the measured swirl-plane velocity fields, and the simulation convergence for multiple cycles was assessed. Flow topology was studied by addressing bulk flow and turbulence quantities, including swirl structure, squish flux, plus geometric and operating parameters, such as the presence of valve cut-outs on the piston surface, compression ratio and engine speed. The results demonstrated that conventional re-entrant bowls have stronger flow separation at intake, hampering bowl swirl, but higher global swirl than for stepped-lip bowls thanks to a stronger and more axisymmetric squish mechanism and less tilted swirl. Stepped-lip bowls have larger inhomogeneities (tilt and axisymmetry) and higher turbulence levels, but also faster turbulence dissipation toward top dead center. They have weaker squish flux but larger squish inversion momentum as a result of the smaller inertia.