Stress relaxation cracking in 304H stainless steel weld of a chemical reactor serviced at 560 °C. (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Stress relaxation cracking in 304H stainless steel weld of a chemical reactor serviced at 560 °C. (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Stress relaxation cracking in 304H stainless steel weld of a chemical reactor serviced at 560 °C
- Authors:
- Yoon, Kee Bong
Yu, Jong Min
Nguyen, Tuan Son - Abstract:
- Highlights: Repeated cracking occurred at repaired 304H stainless steel weld in a thick reactor operated at 560 °C. Stress relaxation cracking is shown to be the most probable cause of cracking. The carbides precipitated within the grain strengthened the grain and prevented grain deformation at high temperature. Fine precipitates were also formed at the grain boundaries, which weakened the grain boundaries. Consequently the intergranular cracking occurred. Abstract: Circumferential cracking was found in 304H stainless steel welds between the nozzle and end-plate of a Stylene Monomer (SM) reactor serviced at 560 °C. The cracks had been repaired, but they repeatedly reappeared after two years of service. Since this reactor and the relevant piping system were constructed as an addition between two existing reactors through a change of process design, the nozzle and connected piping were quite compact. Hence, the pipe system stress by thermal load was a concern. The system stress analysis was conducted using AutoPipe, with the overall pipe modeling connecting the three reactors. The model of 132 m length included various expansion joints, elbows, pipe supports, hangers, tees and reducers. Locations with high system stress were identified, and the system load at the cracking location was determined. The reactor was originally designed for 650 °C, but was actually used at the much lower temperature of 535–565 °C. The local temperature difference along the height of the reactor wasHighlights: Repeated cracking occurred at repaired 304H stainless steel weld in a thick reactor operated at 560 °C. Stress relaxation cracking is shown to be the most probable cause of cracking. The carbides precipitated within the grain strengthened the grain and prevented grain deformation at high temperature. Fine precipitates were also formed at the grain boundaries, which weakened the grain boundaries. Consequently the intergranular cracking occurred. Abstract: Circumferential cracking was found in 304H stainless steel welds between the nozzle and end-plate of a Stylene Monomer (SM) reactor serviced at 560 °C. The cracks had been repaired, but they repeatedly reappeared after two years of service. Since this reactor and the relevant piping system were constructed as an addition between two existing reactors through a change of process design, the nozzle and connected piping were quite compact. Hence, the pipe system stress by thermal load was a concern. The system stress analysis was conducted using AutoPipe, with the overall pipe modeling connecting the three reactors. The model of 132 m length included various expansion joints, elbows, pipe supports, hangers, tees and reducers. Locations with high system stress were identified, and the system load at the cracking location was determined. The reactor was originally designed for 650 °C, but was actually used at the much lower temperature of 535–565 °C. The local temperature difference along the height of the reactor was not negligible, and could generate considerable thermal stress at the cracking location. Detailed finite element analysis was conducted for the cracking location, using ABAQUS. An axi-symmetric model was used for the reactor and the internals. The measured temperature boundary conditions and the load boundary conditions obtained from the pipe stress analysis were employed. Thermal stress, gravitational stress, and pressure stress were calculated at the cracking location during the startup and shutdown as well as during the steady operation period. Finally, the metallurgical characteristics of 304H were investigated. The welding process of the repair was checked. Reheat cracking or stress relaxation cracking was the most suspected reason for cracking. Several suggestions were also made to prevent further cracking. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Engineering failure analysis. Volume 56(2015:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Engineering failure analysis
- Issue:
- Volume 56(2015:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0056-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- 288
- Page End:
- 299
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- 304H -- Stainless steel -- Weld -- Creep -- Stress relaxation cracking
System failures (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Fracture mechanics -- Periodicals
Reliability (Engineering) -- Periodicals
Pannes -- Périodiques
Rupture, Mécanique de la -- Périodiques
Fiabilité -- Périodiques
Fracture mechanics
Reliability (Engineering)
System failures (Engineering)
Periodicals
Electronic journals
620.112 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13506307 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.01.014 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1350-6307
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3760.991000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 8774.xml