Yield and quality development comparison between miscanthus and switchgrass over a period of 10 years. (September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Iqbal, Y.; Gauder, M.; Claupein, W.; Graeff-Hönninger, S.; Lewandowski, I.
• Is Part Of: Energy. Volume 89(2015)
• Page Start: 268
• Page End: 276
• Publication Date: 2015-09
• Subjects: Miscanthus -- Switchgrass -- Harvest date -- N fertilization -- LCA (life cycle assessment) -- Combustion; Power resources -- Periodicals; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.134
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-5442

Abstract

Abstract: The establishment of perennial crops has emerged as a very viable option for biomass-based energy production mainly due to their comparative ecological advantages over annual energy crops. This study is based on data collected from a field trial between 2002 and 2012 and was carried out with the main objective of evaluating the yield and quality performance of miscanthus and switchgrass using different harvest dates and N fertilization regimes (0 kg, 40 kg, 80 kg). Over the whole plantation period (including three years of establishment period), the mean yield of miscanthus was 16.2 t DM ha −1 a −1, while switchgrass yielded 10.2 t DM ha −1 a −1 . In miscanthus, each increase in fertilizer level increased the N content in the harvested biomass, whereas in switchgrass, no significant difference was recorded for 0 kg and 40 kg N levels. The effect of N fertilization on ash was significant but independent of the crop. Both miscanthus and switchgrass biomass samples from the late harvests had a significantly lower N content than those from the early harvests. A Life Cycle Assessment covering the conducted field work and inputs of this trial showed relatively low energy input and emissions connected to the cropping of miscanthus. Highlights: Miscanthus consistently delivered high dry matter yield with high biomass quality. Switchgrass needed high N fertilization doses to achieve its potential yield. Miscanthus biomass has low ash and N content compared to switchgrass. Growing miscanthus has a significant ecological advantage over switchgrass. Delayed harvest decreased the chances of NOx emissions in both crops.