A cross‐sectional survey of mental health service users', carers' and professionals' priorities for patient safety in the United Kingdom. (17th August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Berzins, Kathryn; Baker, John; Brown, Mark; Lawton, Rebecca
• Is Part Of: Health expectations. Volume 21:Number 6(2018)
• Page Start: 1085
• Page End: 1094
• Publication Date: 2018-08-17
• Subjects: attitude of health personnel -- caregivers -- health services research -- inpatients -- mental health services -- patient safety -- surveys and questionnaires; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; Health planning -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1111/hex.12805
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6513

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Establishing patient safety priorities in psychiatry has received less international attention than in other areas of health care. This study aimed to identify safety issues as described by people in the United Kingdom identifying as mental health service users, carers and professionals. Methods: A cross‐sectional online survey was distributed via social media. Identified safety issues were mapped onto the Yorkshire Contributory Factors Framework (YCFF) which categorizes factors that contribute to patient safety incidents in general hospital settings. Service user and carer responses were described separately from professional responses using descriptive statistics. Results: One hundred and eighty‐five responses from 95 service users and carers and 90 professionals were analysed. Seventy different safety issues were identified. These were mapped onto the 17 existing categories of the YCFF and two additional categories created to form the YCFF‐MH. Most frequently identified issues were as follows: "Individual characteristics" (of staff) which included competence and listening skills; "Service process" that contained concerns about waiting times; "Management of staff and staffing levels" dominated by staffing levels; and "External policy context" which included the overall resourcing of services. Professionals identified staffing levels and inadequate community provision more frequently than service users and carers, who in turn identified crisis care more frequently. Conclusions: This study updates knowledge on stakeholder perceived safety issues across mental health care. It shows a far broader range of issues relating to safety than has previously been described. The YCFF was successfully modified to describe these issues and areas for further coproduced research are suggested.